Core i7-13705H vs Xeon W-1390P

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-13705H vs Xeon W-1390P FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-13705H vs Xeon W-1390P: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-13705H

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +11.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB).
✅Draws 45W instead of 125W, a 80W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FCBGA1792 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (24,905 vs 25,016).

Xeon W-1390P

2021

Why buy it

✅+0.4% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-13705H across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 24 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $594 MSRP, while Core i7-13705H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌177.8% higher power demand at 125W vs 45W.
❌Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while Core i7-13705H moves to FCBGA1792 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-13705H better than Xeon W-1390P?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon W-1390P makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i7-13705H is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon W-1390P is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-13705H is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon W-1390P is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Core i7-13705H comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $594 MSRP, and it still gives you a 11.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Xeon W-1390P is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.4% better PassMark. Xeon W-1390P is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (42.1 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-13705H makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2021), a healthier platform with FCBGA1792 and DDR5 instead of LGA1200, and 50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB). That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core i7-13705H vs Xeon W-1390P Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-13705H

The Core i7-13705H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1792. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200, DDR4-3200, LPDDR4x-4267. Passmark benchmark score: 24,905 points. Launch price was $502.

Xeon W-1390P

The Xeon W-1390P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 6 May 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Rocket Lake-S (2021) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 25,016 points. Launch price was $539.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-13705H packs 14 cores / 20 threads, while the Xeon W-1390P offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i7-13705H has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Core i7-13705H versus 5.2 GHz on the Xeon W-1390P — a 3.9% clock advantage for the Xeon W-1390P (base: 2.4 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Core i7-13705H uses the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Xeon W-1390P uses Rocket Lake-S (2021) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-13705H scores 24,905 against the Xeon W-1390P's 25,016 — a 0.4% lead for the Xeon W-1390P. L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Core i7-13705H vs 16 MB (total) on the Xeon W-1390P.

Feature	Core i7-13705H	Xeon W-1390P
Cores / Threads	14 / 20+75%	8 / 16
Boost Clock	5 GHz	5.2 GHz+4%
Base Clock	2.4 GHz	3.5 GHz+46%
L3 Cache	24 MB (total)+50%	16 MB (total)
L2 Cache	2 MB (per core)+300%	512 kB (per core)
Process	Intel 7 nm-50%	14 nm
Architecture	Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024)	Rocket Lake-S (2021)
PassMark	24,905	25,016

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-13705H uses the FCBGA1792 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon W-1390P uses LGA1200 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.