Core i7-13705H vs Ryzen Threadripper 2920X

Core i7-13705H vs Ryzen Threadripper 2920X Performance Spectrum

Core i7-13705H

14 / 20

24,905

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 2920X

12 / 24

25,148

+1.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-13705H vs Ryzen Threadripper 2920X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-13705H vs Ryzen Threadripper 2920X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-13705H

2023

Why buy it

✅Draws 45W instead of 180W, a 135W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FCBGA1792 with DDR5 support instead of SP3r2 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (24,905 vs 25,148).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 32 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X, which brings 12 cores / 24 threads.

Ryzen Threadripper 2920X

2018

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 24 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 24 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $649 MSRP, while Core i7-13705H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌300% higher power demand at 180W vs 45W.
❌Older platform position on SP3r2 with DDR4, while Core i7-13705H moves to FCBGA1792 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen Threadripper 2920X better than Core i7-13705H?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Ryzen Threadripper 2920X makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i7-13705H is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 3.8% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is the stronger fit. You are getting 1% better PassMark, backed by 12 cores and 24 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 24 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is the better buy right now. Ryzen Threadripper 2920X comes in at an unclear MSRP at $649 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 3.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (38.7 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-13705H makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2018) and a healthier platform with FCBGA1792 and DDR5 instead of SP3r2. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core i7-13705H vs Ryzen Threadripper 2920X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-13705H

The Core i7-13705H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1792. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200, DDR4-3200, LPDDR4x-4267. Passmark benchmark score: 24,905 points. Launch price was $502.

Ryzen Threadripper 2920X

The Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 3 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the ZEN+ (2018−2019) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: SP3r2. Thermal design power (TDP): 180 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Quad-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 25,148 points. Launch price was $649.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-13705H packs 14 cores / 20 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper 2920X offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Core i7-13705H has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Core i7-13705H versus 4.3 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper 2920X — a 15.1% clock advantage for the Core i7-13705H (base: 2.4 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Core i7-13705H uses the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper 2920X uses ZEN+ (2018−2019) (12 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-13705H scores 24,905 against the Ryzen Threadripper 2920X's 25,148 — a 1% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper 2920X. L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Core i7-13705H vs 32 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper 2920X.

Feature	Core i7-13705H	Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
Cores / Threads	14 / 20+17%	12 / 24
Boost Clock	5 GHz+16%	4.3 GHz
Base Clock	2.4 GHz	3.5 GHz+46%
L3 Cache	24 MB (total)	32 MB+33%
L2 Cache	2 MB (per core)	512K (per core)+25500%
Process	Intel 7 nm-42%	12 nm
Architecture	Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024)	ZEN+ (2018−2019)
PassMark	24,905	25,148

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-13705H uses the FCBGA1792 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper 2920X uses SP3r2 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.