Core i7-13705H vs Xeon E5-2696 v4

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-13705H vs Xeon E5-2696 v4 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-13705H vs Xeon E5-2696 v4: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-13705H

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +14.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 45W instead of 150W, a 105W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FCBGA1792 with DDR5 support instead of FCLGA2011-3 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (24,905 vs 24,938).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 55 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2696 v4, which brings 22 cores / 44 threads.

Xeon E5-2696 v4

2016

Why buy it

✅+0.1% higher PassMark.
✅+129.2% larger total L3 cache (55 MB vs 24 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 22 cores / 44 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-13705H across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌233.3% higher power demand at 150W vs 45W.
❌Older platform position on FCLGA2011-3 with DDR4, while Core i7-13705H moves to FCBGA1792 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-13705H better than Xeon E5-2696 v4?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5-2696 v4 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i7-13705H is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-2696 v4 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 22 cores and 44 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 129.2% larger total L3 cache (55 MB vs 24 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-13705H still makes the most sense overall. Core i7-13705H comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 14.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-13705H makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2016) and a healthier platform with FCBGA1792 and DDR5 instead of FCLGA2011-3. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core i7-13705H vs Xeon E5-2696 v4 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-13705H

The Core i7-13705H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1792. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200, DDR4-3200, LPDDR4x-4267. Passmark benchmark score: 24,905 points. Launch price was $502.

Xeon E5-2696 v4

The Xeon E5-2696 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 22 cores and 44 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 55 MB. L2 cache: 5.5 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCLGA2011-3. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 24,938 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-13705H packs 14 cores / 20 threads, while the Xeon E5-2696 v4 offers 22 cores / 44 threads — the Xeon E5-2696 v4 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Core i7-13705H versus 3.6 GHz on the Xeon E5-2696 v4 — a 32.6% clock advantage for the Core i7-13705H (base: 2.4 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Core i7-13705H uses the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Xeon E5-2696 v4 uses Broadwell (2015−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-13705H scores 24,905 against the Xeon E5-2696 v4's 24,938 — a 0.1% lead for the Xeon E5-2696 v4. L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Core i7-13705H vs 55 MB on the Xeon E5-2696 v4.

Feature	Core i7-13705H	Xeon E5-2696 v4
Cores / Threads	14 / 20	22 / 44+57%
Boost Clock	5 GHz+39%	3.6 GHz
Base Clock	2.4 GHz+9%	2.2 GHz
L3 Cache	24 MB (total)	55 MB+129%
L2 Cache	2 MB (per core)	5.5 MB+175%
Process	Intel 7 nm-50%	14 nm
Architecture	Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024)	Broadwell (2015−2019)
PassMark	24,905	24,938

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-13705H uses the FCBGA1792 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon E5-2696 v4 uses FCLGA2011-3 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.