Xeon E5410 vs Core M-5Y51
Xeon E5410
Core M-5Y51
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Xeon E5410 is positioned at rank 918 and the Core M-5Y51 is on rank 1154, so the Xeon E5410 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5410
Performance Per Dollar Core M-5Y51
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Xeon E5410 | Core M-5Y51 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($20) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($281) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Harpertown (2007−2008) / 45 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Broadwell-Y (2014) / 14 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Xeon E5410 | Core M-5Y51 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+1306%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($20) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($281) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon E5410 and Core M-5Y51
Xeon E5410
The Xeon E5410 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 November 2007 (18 years ago). It is based on the Harpertown (2007−2008) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.33 GHz, with boost up to 0.33 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 6 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA771. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR2, DDR3 Depends on motherboard. Passmark benchmark score: 2,032 points. Launch price was $256.
Core M-5Y51
The Core M-5Y51 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 October 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell-Y (2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1234. Thermal design power (TDP): 4.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,030 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
The Xeon E5410 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core M-5Y51 offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Xeon E5410 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 0.33 GHz on the Xeon E5410 versus 2.6 GHz on the Core M-5Y51 — a 154.9% clock advantage for the Core M-5Y51 (base: 2.33 GHz vs 1.1 GHz). The Xeon E5410 uses the Harpertown (2007−2008) architecture (45 nm), while the Core M-5Y51 uses Broadwell-Y (2014) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E5410 scores 2,032 against the Core M-5Y51's 2,030 — a 0.1% lead for the Xeon E5410. L3 cache: 12 MB L2 Cache on the Xeon E5410 vs 4 MB (total) on the Core M-5Y51.
| Feature | Xeon E5410 | Core M-5Y51 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4+100% | 2 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 0.33 GHz | 2.6 GHz+688% |
| Base Clock | 2.33 GHz+112% | 1.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB L2 Cache+200% | 4 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB (total)+2300% | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 45 nm | 14 nm-69% |
| Architecture | Harpertown (2007−2008) | Broadwell-Y (2014) |
| PassMark | 2,032 | 2,030 |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon E5410 uses the LGA771 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core M-5Y51 uses FCBGA1234 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Xeon E5410 | Core M-5Y51 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA771 | FCBGA1234 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 3.0+50% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR2-667 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | ✅ | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x (Xeon E5410) / not specified (Core M-5Y51). Primary use case: Xeon E5410 targets Server.
| Feature | Xeon E5410 | Core M-5Y51 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x | — |
| Target Use | Server | — |
Value Analysis
The Xeon E5410 launched at $256 MSRP, while the Core M-5Y51 debuted at $281. At current prices ($20 vs $281), the Xeon E5410 is $261 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon E5410 delivers 101.6 pts/$ vs 7.2 pts/$ for the Core M-5Y51 — making the Xeon E5410 the 173.4% better value option.
| Feature | Xeon E5410 | Core M-5Y51 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $256-9% | $281 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $20-93% | $281 |
| Performance per Dollar | 101.6+1311% | 7.2 |
| Release Date | 2007 | 2014 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Xeon E5410 and Core M-5Y51
