Xeon E5410
VS
Phenom II X4 810

Xeon E5410 vs Phenom II X4 810

Intel

Xeon E5410

4 Cores4 Thrd80 WWMax: 0.33 GHz2007
VS
AMD

Phenom II X4 810

4 Cores4 Thrd95 WWMax: 2.6 GHz2009

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Xeon E5410 is positioned at rank 918 and the Phenom II X4 810 is on rank 312, so the Phenom II X4 810 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5410

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
26174%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
4942%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
4391%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
3392%
#516
Xeon E7-8867 v3
MSRP: $4672|Avg: $4672
99%
#517
Xeon Gold 6150
MSRP: $3358|Avg: $196
99%
#518
Xeon E5-1680 v3
MSRP: $1723|Avg: $200
97%
#519
Xeon E5-2690 v3
MSRP: $2090|Avg: $85
97%
#520
Xeon 6780E
MSRP: $11350|Avg: $8513
96%
#521
Xeon E5-2697A v4
MSRP: $2891|Avg: $121
94%
#522
Xeon Gold 6134
MSRP: $2214|Avg: $378
94%
#523
Xeon Gold 6138T
MSRP: $2742|Avg: $400
93%
#918
Xeon E5410
MSRP: $256|Avg: $20
100%
#924
Xeon E5-1660
MSRP: $1080|Avg: $29
97%
#931
Xeon E5-2660 v2
MSRP: $1393|Avg: $129
94%
#933
Xeon Silver 4112
MSRP: $885|Avg: $67
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Phenom II X4 810

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
4593%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
4340%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
3151%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
949%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
752%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
658%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
377%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
372%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
339%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
339%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
335%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
326%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
321%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
320%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
317%
#287
Core Ultra 9 285T
MSRP: $549|Avg: $549
99%
#288
Core i5-12500TE
MSRP: $225|Avg: $225
98%
#289
Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE
MSRP: $108|Avg: $70
98%
#290
Core i9-10900KF
MSRP: $509|Avg: $336
97%
#291
Core i9-14900T
MSRP: $549|Avg: $577
97%
#292
Core i5-13500T
MSRP: $342|Avg: $342
97%
#293
Core i3-10300
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $140.49
97%
#294
Core i9-10900F
MSRP: $464|Avg: $300
97%
#312
Phenom II X4 810
MSRP: $175|Avg: N/A
100%
#314
Athlon 5150
MSRP: $21|Avg: $21
99%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($20) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The Xeon E5410 is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightXeon E5410Phenom II X4 810
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($20)
⚠️ Higher cost ($175)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Harpertown (2007−2008) / 45 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Deneb (2009−2011) / 45 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Phenom II X4 810 ($175), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($155 less, 775% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightXeon E5410Phenom II X4 810
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+773%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($20)
⚠️ Higher cost ($175)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon E5410 and Phenom II X4 810

Intel

Xeon E5410

The Xeon E5410 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 November 2007 (18 years ago). It is based on the Harpertown (2007−2008) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.33 GHz, with boost up to 0.33 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 6 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA771. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR2, DDR3 Depends on motherboard. Passmark benchmark score: 2,032 points. Launch price was $256.

AMD

Phenom II X4 810

The Phenom II X4 810 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 9 February 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Deneb (2009−2011) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,036 points. Launch price was $116.

Processing Power

Both the Xeon E5410 and Phenom II X4 810 share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 0.33 GHz on the Xeon E5410 versus 2.6 GHz on the Phenom II X4 810 — a 154.9% clock advantage for the Phenom II X4 810 (base: 2.33 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Xeon E5410 uses the Harpertown (2007−2008) architecture (45 nm), while the Phenom II X4 810 uses Deneb (2009−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E5410 scores 2,032 against the Phenom II X4 810's 2,036 — a 0.2% lead for the Phenom II X4 810. L3 cache: 12 MB L2 Cache on the Xeon E5410 vs 4 MB (total) on the Phenom II X4 810.

FeatureXeon E5410Phenom II X4 810
Cores / Threads
4 / 4
4 / 4
Boost Clock
0.33 GHz
2.6 GHz+688%
Base Clock
2.33 GHz
2.6 GHz+12%
L3 Cache
12 MB L2 Cache+200%
4 MB (total)
L2 Cache
6 MB (total)+1100%
512 kB (per core)
Process
45 nm
45 nm
Architecture
Harpertown (2007−2008)
Deneb (2009−2011)
PassMark
2,032
2,036
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon E5410 uses the LGA771 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Phenom II X4 810 uses AM3 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureXeon E5410Phenom II X4 810
Socket
LGA771
AM3
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR2-667
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Xeon E5410) / not specified (Phenom II X4 810). Primary use case: Xeon E5410 targets Server.

FeatureXeon E5410Phenom II X4 810
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x
Target Use
Server
💰

Value Analysis

The Xeon E5410 launched at $256 MSRP, while the Phenom II X4 810 debuted at $175.

FeatureXeon E5410Phenom II X4 810
MSRP
$256
$175-32%
Avg Price (30d)
$20
Release Date
2007
2009