
Xeon E5440 vs Core i3-3245

Xeon E5440

Core i3-3245
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Xeon E5440 is positioned at rank 1008 and the Core i3-3245 is on rank 794, so the Core i3-3245 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5440
Performance Per Dollar Core i3-3245
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Xeon E5440 | Core i3-3245 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($37) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($50) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Harpertown (2007−2008) / 45 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Legacy / 22 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Xeon E5440 | Core i3-3245 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+33%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($37) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($50) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon E5440 and Core i3-3245

Xeon E5440
The Xeon E5440 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 November 2007 (18 years ago). It is based on the Harpertown (2007−2008) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.83 GHz, with boost up to 0.83 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 6 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA771. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR2, DDR3 Depends on motherboard. Passmark benchmark score: 2,367 points. Launch price was $690.

Core i3-3245
The Core i3-3245 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 April 2013 (12 years ago). It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency: 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB Intel® Smart Cache. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 2,412 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
The Xeon E5440 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i3-3245 offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Xeon E5440 has 2 more cores. The Xeon E5440 is built on the Harpertown (2007−2008) architecture. In PassMark, the Xeon E5440 scores 2,367 against the Core i3-3245's 2,412 — a 1.9% lead for the Core i3-3245. L3 cache: 12 MB L2 Cache on the Xeon E5440 vs 3 MB Intel® Smart Cache on the Core i3-3245.
| Feature | Xeon E5440 | Core i3-3245 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4+100% | 2 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 0.83 GHz | — |
| Base Clock | 2.83 GHz | 3.4 GHz+20% |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB L2 Cache+300% | 3 MB Intel® Smart Cache |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB (total) | — |
| Process | 45 nm | 22 nm-51% |
| Architecture | Harpertown (2007−2008) | — |
| PassMark | 2,367 | 2,412+2% |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon E5440 uses the LGA771 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i3-3245 uses LGA1155 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Xeon E5440 | Core i3-3245 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA771 | LGA1155 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 3.0+50% |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR3-1600 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 32 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 16 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Xeon E5440) / VT-x (Core i3-3245). The Core i3-3245 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 4000), while the Xeon E5440 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-3245 targets Desktop.
| Feature | Xeon E5440 | Core i3-3245 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | HD Graphics 4000 |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x |
| Target Use | — | Desktop |
Value Analysis
The Xeon E5440 launched at $690 MSRP, while the Core i3-3245 debuted at $120. At current prices ($37 vs $50), the Xeon E5440 is $13 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon E5440 delivers 64.0 pts/$ vs 48.2 pts/$ for the Core i3-3245 — making the Xeon E5440 the 28% better value option.
| Feature | Xeon E5440 | Core i3-3245 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $690 | $120-83% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $37-26% | $50 |
| Performance per Dollar | 64.0+33% | 48.2 |
| Release Date | 2007 | 2013 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















