
Xeon E5440 vs Pentium P6200

Xeon E5440

Pentium P6200
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Xeon E5440 is positioned at rank 1008 and the Pentium P6200 is on rank 557, so the Pentium P6200 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5440
Performance Per Dollar Pentium P6200
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Xeon E5440 | Pentium P6200 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($37) | ✅ More affordable ($25) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Harpertown (2007−2008) / 45 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Arrandale (2010−2011) / 32 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Xeon E5440 | Pentium P6200 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+50%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($37) | ✅ More affordable ($25) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon E5440 and Pentium P6200

Xeon E5440
The Xeon E5440 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 November 2007 (18 years ago). It is based on the Harpertown (2007−2008) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.83 GHz, with boost up to 0.83 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 6 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA771. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR2, DDR3 Depends on motherboard. Passmark benchmark score: 2,367 points. Launch price was $690.

Pentium P6200
The Pentium P6200 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 26 September 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.13 GHz, with boost up to 0.13 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,394 points. Launch price was $60.
Processing Power
The Xeon E5440 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Pentium P6200 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Xeon E5440 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 0.83 GHz on the Xeon E5440 versus 0.13 GHz on the Pentium P6200 — a 145.8% clock advantage for the Xeon E5440 (base: 2.83 GHz vs 2.13 GHz). The Xeon E5440 uses the Harpertown (2007−2008) architecture (45 nm), while the Pentium P6200 uses Arrandale (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E5440 scores 2,367 against the Pentium P6200's 2,394 — a 1.1% lead for the Pentium P6200. L3 cache: 12 MB L2 Cache on the Xeon E5440 vs 3 MB (total) on the Pentium P6200.
| Feature | Xeon E5440 | Pentium P6200 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4+100% | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 0.83 GHz+538% | 0.13 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.83 GHz+33% | 2.13 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB L2 Cache+300% | 3 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB (total)+2300% | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 45 nm | 32 nm-29% |
| Architecture | Harpertown (2007−2008) | Arrandale (2010−2011) |
| PassMark | 2,367 | 2,394+1% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 200 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 400 |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon E5440 uses the LGA771 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium P6200 uses PGA988 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Xeon E5440 | Pentium P6200 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA771 | PGA988 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR3-1066 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 8 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 16 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Xeon E5440) / None (Pentium P6200). The Pentium P6200 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics), while the Xeon E5440 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Pentium P6200 targets Legacy Laptop.
| Feature | Xeon E5440 | Pentium P6200 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Intel HD Graphics |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | None |
| Target Use | — | Legacy Laptop |
Value Analysis
The Xeon E5440 launched at $690 MSRP, while the Pentium P6200 debuted at $60. At current prices ($37 vs $25), the Pentium P6200 is $12 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon E5440 delivers 64.0 pts/$ vs 95.8 pts/$ for the Pentium P6200 — making the Pentium P6200 the 39.8% better value option.
| Feature | Xeon E5440 | Pentium P6200 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $690 | $60-91% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $37 | $25-32% |
| Performance per Dollar | 64.0 | 95.8+50% |
| Release Date | 2007 | 2010 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











