Xeon E5640 vs Xeon X7460

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon E5640 vs Xeon X7460 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon E5640 vs Xeon X7460: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon E5640

2010

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +11.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 80W instead of 130W, a 50W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (4,755 vs 4,803).

Xeon X7460

2008

Why buy it

✅+1% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5640 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌62.5% higher power demand at 130W vs 80W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E5640 better than Xeon X7460?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Xeon E5640 is ahead with a 11.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon X7460 pulls ahead with 1% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon X7460 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 6 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E5640 still makes the most sense overall. Xeon E5640 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 11.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon E5640 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2010 vs 2008). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Xeon E5640 vs Xeon X7460 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon E5640

The Xeon E5640 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. Passmark benchmark score: 4,755 points. Launch price was $800.

Xeon X7460

The Xeon X7460 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 September 2008 (17 years ago). It is based on the Dunnington (2008) architecture. It features 6 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 2.66 GHz, with boost up to 0.67 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 3 MB (per module). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PGA604. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,803 points. Launch price was $2,729.

⚡

Processing Power

The Xeon X7460 is built on the Dunnington (2008) architecture. In PassMark, the Xeon E5640 scores 4,755 against the Xeon X7460's 4,803 — a 1% lead for the Xeon X7460.

Feature	Xeon E5640	Xeon X7460
Cores / Threads	—	6 / 6
Boost Clock	—	0.67 GHz
Base Clock	—	2.66 GHz
L3 Cache	—	16 MB (total)
L2 Cache	—	3 MB (per module)
Process	—	45 nm
Architecture	—	Dunnington (2008)
PassMark	4,755	4,803+1%

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Xeon E5640) / VT-x (Xeon X7460). Primary use case: Xeon X7460 targets Server. Direct competitor: Xeon X7460 rivals Core i7-980X.