Opteron 6220 vs Xeon E5640

Opteron 6220 vs Xeon E5640 Performance Spectrum

Opteron 6220

8 / 8

4,753

0.0%

Athlon X4 740

FX-4350

FX-6100

Ryzen Embedded R1606G

Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H

Ryzen AI Max PRO 390

Ryzen 9 9955HX3D

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

Xeon E5640

4 / 8

4,755

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Opteron 6220 vs Xeon E5640 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Opteron 6220 vs Xeon E5640: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Opteron 6220

2011

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (4,753 vs 4,755).
❌Launch MSRP is still $523 MSRP, while Xeon E5640 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌43.8% higher power demand at 115W vs 80W.

Xeon E5640

2010

Why buy it

✅Draws 80W instead of 115W, a 35W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E5640 better than Opteron 6220?

Yes. Xeon E5640 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 1.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon E5640 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1.6% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5640 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0% better PassMark.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E5640 is still the faster CPU overall, but Opteron 6220 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Xeon E5640 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $523 MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Opteron 6220 is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (9.1 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Opteron 6220 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2011 vs 2010). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Opteron 6220 vs Xeon E5640 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Opteron 6220

The Opteron 6220 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 14 November 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Interlagos (2011−2012) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per module). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: G34. Thermal design power (TDP): 115 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,753 points. Launch price was $523.

Xeon E5640

The Xeon E5640 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. Passmark benchmark score: 4,755 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Opteron 6220 is built on the Interlagos (2011−2012) architecture. In PassMark, the Opteron 6220 scores 4,753 against the Xeon E5640's 4,755 — a 0% lead for the Xeon E5640.

Feature	Opteron 6220	Xeon E5640
Cores / Threads	8 / 8	—
Boost Clock	3.6 GHz	—
Base Clock	3 GHz	—
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)	—
L2 Cache	2 MB (per module)	—
Process	32 nm	—
Architecture	Interlagos (2011−2012)	—
PassMark	4,753	4,755