Opteron 6220 vs Xeon X7460

Opteron 6220 vs Xeon X7460 Performance Spectrum

Opteron 6220

8 / 8

4,753

0.0%

Athlon X4 740

FX-4350

FX-6100

Ryzen Embedded R1606G

Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H

Ryzen AI Max PRO 390

Ryzen 9 9955HX3D

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

Xeon X7460

6 / 6

4,803

+1.1%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Opteron 6220 vs Xeon X7460 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Opteron 6220 vs Xeon X7460: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Opteron 6220

2011

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +12.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 115W instead of 130W, a 15W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (4,753 vs 4,803).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 16 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $523 MSRP, while Xeon X7460 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon X7460

2008

Why buy it

✅+1.1% higher PassMark.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 8 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Opteron 6220 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Quick Answers

So, is Opteron 6220 better than Xeon X7460?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Opteron 6220 is ahead with a 12.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon X7460 pulls ahead with 1.1% better PassMark. Xeon X7460 also has the bigger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 8 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon X7460 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.1% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 6 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 8 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Opteron 6220 is the better buy right now. Opteron 6220 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $523 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 12.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Xeon X7460 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 1.1% better PassMark. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (9.1 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Opteron 6220 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2011 vs 2008). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Opteron 6220 vs Xeon X7460 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Opteron 6220

The Opteron 6220 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 14 November 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Interlagos (2011−2012) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per module). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: G34. Thermal design power (TDP): 115 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,753 points. Launch price was $523.

Xeon X7460

The Xeon X7460 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 September 2008 (17 years ago). It is based on the Dunnington (2008) architecture. It features 6 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 2.66 GHz, with boost up to 0.67 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 3 MB (per module). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PGA604. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,803 points. Launch price was $2,729.

⚡

Processing Power

The Opteron 6220 packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon X7460 offers 6 cores / 6 threads — the Opteron 6220 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the Opteron 6220 versus 0.67 GHz on the Xeon X7460 — a 137.2% clock advantage for the Opteron 6220 (base: 3 GHz vs 2.66 GHz). The Opteron 6220 uses the Interlagos (2011−2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Xeon X7460 uses Dunnington (2008) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Opteron 6220 scores 4,753 against the Xeon X7460's 4,803 — a 1% lead for the Xeon X7460. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Opteron 6220 vs 16 MB (total) on the Xeon X7460.

Feature	Opteron 6220	Xeon X7460
Cores / Threads	8 / 8+33%	6 / 6
Boost Clock	3.6 GHz+437%	0.67 GHz
Base Clock	3 GHz+13%	2.66 GHz
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)	16 MB (total)+100%
L2 Cache	2 MB (per module)	3 MB (per module)+50%
Process	32 nm-29%	45 nm
Architecture	Interlagos (2011−2012)	Dunnington (2008)
PassMark	4,753	4,803+1%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Opteron 6220 uses the G34 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Xeon X7460 uses PGA604 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Opteron 6220	Xeon X7460
Socket	G34	PGA604
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	—	DDR2-667
RAM Channels	—	4
ECC Support	—	Yes

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Opteron 6220) / VT-x (Xeon X7460). Primary use case: Xeon X7460 targets Server. Direct competitor: Xeon X7460 rivals Core i7-980X.