Opteron 6220 vs Xeon Bronze 3204

Opteron 6220 vs Xeon Bronze 3204 Performance Spectrum

Opteron 6220

8 / 8

4,753

0.0%

Athlon X4 740

FX-4350

FX-6100

Ryzen Embedded R1606G

Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H

Ryzen AI Max PRO 390

Ryzen 9 9955HX3D

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

Xeon Bronze 3204

6 / 6

4,797

+0.9%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Opteron 6220 vs Xeon Bronze 3204 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Opteron 6220 vs Xeon Bronze 3204: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Opteron 6220

2011

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +15.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (4,753 vs 4,797).
❌Launch MSRP is still $523 MSRP, while Xeon Bronze 3204 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌35.3% higher power demand at 115W vs 85W.

Xeon Bronze 3204

2019

Why buy it

✅+0.9% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 85W instead of 115W, a 30W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Opteron 6220 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon Bronze 3204 better than Opteron 6220?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Opteron 6220 is ahead with a 15.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Bronze 3204 pulls ahead with 0.9% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Bronze 3204 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.9% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 6 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon Bronze 3204 is still the faster CPU overall, but Opteron 6220 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Xeon Bronze 3204 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $523 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.9% better PassMark. The compromise is that Opteron 6220 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 15.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Opteron 6220 is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (9.1 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon Bronze 3204 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2011), more multi-core headroom with 6 cores / 6 threads instead of 8/8, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Opteron 6220 vs Xeon Bronze 3204 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Opteron 6220

The Opteron 6220 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 14 November 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Interlagos (2011−2012) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per module). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: G34. Thermal design power (TDP): 115 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,753 points. Launch price was $523.

Xeon Bronze 3204

The Xeon Bronze 3204 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 6 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 1.9 GHz. L3 cache: 8.25 MB. L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 85 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 4,797 points. Launch price was $213.

⚡

Processing Power

The Opteron 6220 packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon Bronze 3204 offers 6 cores / 6 threads — the Opteron 6220 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the Opteron 6220 versus 1.9 GHz on the Xeon Bronze 3204 — a 61.8% clock advantage for the Opteron 6220 (base: 3 GHz vs 1.9 GHz). The Opteron 6220 uses the Interlagos (2011−2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Xeon Bronze 3204 uses Cascade Lake (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Opteron 6220 scores 4,753 against the Xeon Bronze 3204's 4,797 — a 0.9% lead for the Xeon Bronze 3204. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Opteron 6220 vs 8.25 MB on the Xeon Bronze 3204.

Feature	Opteron 6220	Xeon Bronze 3204
Cores / Threads	8 / 8+33%	6 / 6
Boost Clock	3.6 GHz+89%	1.9 GHz
Base Clock	3 GHz+58%	1.9 GHz
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)	8.25 MB+3%
L2 Cache	2 MB (per module)	6 MB+200%
Process	32 nm	14 nm-56%
Architecture	Interlagos (2011−2012)	Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
PassMark	4,753	4,797

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Opteron 6220 uses the G34 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Xeon Bronze 3204 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.