Opteron 6220 vs Xeon X5667

Opteron 6220 vs Xeon X5667 Performance Spectrum

Opteron 6220

8 / 8

4,753

+1.2%

Athlon X4 740

FX-4350

FX-6100

Ryzen Embedded R1606G

Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H

Ryzen AI Max PRO 390

Ryzen 9 9955HX3D

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

Xeon X5667

4 / 8

4,697

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Opteron 6220 vs Xeon X5667 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Opteron 6220 vs Xeon X5667: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Opteron 6220

2011

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +5.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 12 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $523 MSRP, while Xeon X5667 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌21.1% higher power demand at 115W vs 95W.

Xeon X5667

2010

Why buy it

✅+50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).
✅Draws 95W instead of 115W, a 20W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Opteron 6220 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (4,697 vs 4,753).

Quick Answers

So, is Opteron 6220 better than Xeon X5667?

Yes. Opteron 6220 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 5.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 1.2% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Opteron 6220 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 5.8% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Opteron 6220 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.2% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Opteron 6220 is the better buy right now. Opteron 6220 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $523 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 5.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (9.1 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Opteron 6220 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2011 vs 2010) and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 8 threads instead of 4/8. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Opteron 6220 vs Xeon X5667 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Opteron 6220

The Opteron 6220 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 14 November 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Interlagos (2011−2012) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per module). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: G34. Thermal design power (TDP): 115 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,753 points. Launch price was $523.

Xeon X5667

The Xeon X5667 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 16 March 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Westmere-EP (2010−2011) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.06 GHz, with boost up to 3.46 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,697 points. Launch price was $80.

⚡

Processing Power

The Opteron 6220 packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon X5667 offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Opteron 6220 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the Opteron 6220 versus 3.46 GHz on the Xeon X5667 — a 4% clock advantage for the Opteron 6220 (base: 3 GHz vs 3.06 GHz). The Opteron 6220 uses the Interlagos (2011−2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Xeon X5667 uses Westmere-EP (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Opteron 6220 scores 4,753 against the Xeon X5667's 4,697 — a 1.2% lead for the Opteron 6220. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Opteron 6220 vs 12 MB (total) on the Xeon X5667.

Feature	Opteron 6220	Xeon X5667
Cores / Threads	8 / 8+100%	4 / 8
Boost Clock	3.6 GHz+4%	3.46 GHz
Base Clock	3 GHz	3.06 GHz+2%
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)	12 MB (total)+50%
L2 Cache	2 MB (per module)+700%	256 kB (per core)
Process	32 nm	32 nm
Architecture	Interlagos (2011−2012)	Westmere-EP (2010−2011)
PassMark	4,753+1%	4,697

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Opteron 6220 uses the G34 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Xeon X5667 uses LGA1366 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Opteron 6220	Xeon X5667
Socket	G34	LGA1366
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	—	DDR3-1333
RAM Channels	—	3
ECC Support	—	Yes

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Opteron 6220) / VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon X5667). Primary use case: Xeon X5667 targets Workstation. Direct competitor: Xeon X5667 rivals Core i7-980X.