Core i5-7400T vs Opteron 6220

CPU

GPU

Core i5-7400T

4 Cores4 Thrd35 WWMax: 3 GHz2017

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

Opteron 6220

8 Cores8 Thrd115 WWMax: 3.6 GHz2011

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

Core i5-7400T vs Opteron 6220 Performance Spectrum

Core i5-7400T

4 / 4

4,692

0.0%

4,753

+1.3%

Athlon X4 740

FX-4350

FX-6100

Ryzen Embedded R1606G

Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H

Ryzen AI Max PRO 390

Ryzen 9 9955HX3D

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-7400T vs Opteron 6220 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-7400T vs Opteron 6220: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-7400T

2017

Why buy it

✅Costs $341 less on MSRP ($182 MSRP vs $523 MSRP).
✅Delivers 183.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 25.8 vs 9.1 PassMark/$ ($182 MSRP vs $523 MSRP).
✅Draws 35W instead of 115W, a 80W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics 630, while Opteron 6220 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Opteron 6220 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (4,692 vs 4,753).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 8 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Opteron 6220, which brings 8 cores / 8 threads.

Opteron 6220

2011

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +15.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 8 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 9.1 vs 25.8 PassMark/$ ($523 MSRP vs $182 MSRP).
❌228.6% higher power demand at 115W vs 35W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-7400T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-7400T.

Quick Answers

So, is Opteron 6220 better than Core i5-7400T?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Opteron 6220 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i5-7400T is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Opteron 6220 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 15.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Opteron 6220 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.3% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 8 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Opteron 6220 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Opteron 6220 comes in 187.4% more expensive on MSRP at $523 MSRP versus $182 MSRP, and it still gives you a 15.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i5-7400T only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2017 platform. Even with 183.7% better value on paper (25.8 vs 9.1 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA1151.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-7400T makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2011). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i5-7400T vs Opteron 6220 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-7400T

The Core i5-7400T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 4,692 points. Launch price was $187.

Opteron 6220

The Opteron 6220 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 14 November 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Interlagos (2011−2012) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per module). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: G34. Thermal design power (TDP): 115 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,753 points. Launch price was $523.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-7400T packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Opteron 6220 offers 8 cores / 8 threads — the Opteron 6220 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the Core i5-7400T versus 3.6 GHz on the Opteron 6220 — a 18.2% clock advantage for the Opteron 6220 (base: 2.4 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Core i5-7400T uses the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Opteron 6220 uses Interlagos (2011−2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-7400T scores 4,692 against the Opteron 6220's 4,753 — a 1.3% lead for the Opteron 6220. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i5-7400T vs 8 MB (total) on the Opteron 6220.

Feature	Core i5-7400T	Opteron 6220
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	8 / 8+100%
Boost Clock	3 GHz	3.6 GHz+20%
Base Clock	2.4 GHz	3 GHz+25%
L3 Cache	6 MB (total)	8 MB (total)+33%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)+12700%	2 MB (per module)
Process	14 nm-56%	32 nm
Architecture	Kaby Lake (2016−2019)	Interlagos (2011−2012)
PassMark	4,692	4,753+1%
Cinebench R23 Multi	3,334	—
Geekbench 6 Single	1,069	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	2,463	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-7400T uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Opteron 6220 uses G34 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i5-7400T	Opteron 6220
Socket	LGA1151	G34
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2400	—
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: Yes (Core i5-7400T) / not specified (Opteron 6220). The Core i5-7400T includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 630), while the Opteron 6220 requires a dedicated GPU.

Feature	Core i5-7400T	Opteron 6220
Integrated GPU	Yes	—
IGPU Model	Intel HD Graphics 630	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	Yes	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i5-7400T was priced at $182, while the Opteron 6220 came in at $523. On launch pricing ($182 vs $523), Core i5-7400T was $341 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-7400T delivers 25.8 pts/$ vs 9.1 pts/$ for the Opteron 6220 — making the Core i5-7400T the 95.7% better value option.

Feature	Core i5-7400T	Opteron 6220
MSRP	$182-65%	$523
Performance per Dollar	25.8+184%	9.1
Release Date	2017	2011

Search Core i5-7400T on Amazon

Search Opteron 6220 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.