
Core i5-7400T

N200
Core i5-7400T vs N200 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i5-7400T vs N200 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i5-7400T vs N200: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i5-7400T
2017Why buy it
- ✅Costs $11 less on MSRP ($182 MSRP vs $193 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics 630, while N200 needs a discrete GPU.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike N200.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (4,692 vs 4,729).
- ❌483.3% higher power demand at 35W vs 6W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA1151 with DDR4, while N200 moves to FCBGA1264 and DDR5.
N200
2023Why buy it
- ✅Draws 6W instead of 35W, a 29W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA1264 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1151 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌6% HIGHER MSRP$193 MSRPvs$182 MSRP
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-7400T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-7400T.
Quick Answers
So, is N200 better than Core i5-7400T?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-7400T vs N200 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-7400T
The Core i5-7400T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 4,692 points. Launch price was $187.

N200
The N200 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2023 (2 years ago). It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB Intel® Smart Cache. Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1264. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200, DDR5-4800, LPDDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 4,729 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
Both the Core i5-7400T and N200 share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the Core i5-7400T versus 3.7 GHz on the N200 — a 20.9% clock advantage for the N200. The Core i5-7400T is built on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. In PassMark, the Core i5-7400T scores 4,692 against the N200's 4,729 — a 0.8% lead for the N200. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i5-7400T vs 6 MB Intel® Smart Cache on the N200.
| Feature | Core i5-7400T | N200 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 4 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 3 GHz | 3.7 GHz+23% |
| Base Clock | 2.4 GHz | — |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB (total) | 6 MB Intel® Smart Cache |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | — |
| Process | 14 nm | Intel 7 nm-50% |
| Architecture | Kaby Lake (2016−2019) | — |
| PassMark | 4,692 | 4,729 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 3,334 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,069 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 2,463 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-7400T uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the N200 uses FCBGA1264 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-7400T | N200 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1151 | FCBGA1264 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2400 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: Yes (Core i5-7400T) / not specified (N200). The Core i5-7400T includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 630), while the N200 requires a dedicated GPU.
| Feature | Core i5-7400T | N200 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Intel HD Graphics 630 | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | Yes | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i5-7400T was priced at $182, while the N200 came in at $193. On launch pricing ($182 vs $193), Core i5-7400T was $11 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-7400T delivers 25.8 pts/$ vs 24.5 pts/$ for the N200 — making the Core i5-7400T the 5.1% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-7400T | N200 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $182-6% | $193 |
| Performance per Dollar | 25.8+5% | 24.5 |
| Release Date | 2017 | 2023 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














