Xeon E7540 vs Xeon Silver 4109T

Intel

Xeon E7540

6 Cores12 Thrd105 WWMax: 2.27 GHz2010
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Xeon Silver 4109T

8 Cores16 Thrd70 WWMax: 3 GHz2017
Similar parts
·······

Xeon E7540 vs Xeon Silver 4109T Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon E7540 vs Xeon Silver 4109T FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon E7540 vs Xeon Silver 4109T: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon E7540

2010

Why buy it

  • +0.3% higher PassMark.
  • +63.6% larger total L3 cache (18 MB vs 11 MB).
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (32 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Silver 4109T across 43 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Launch MSRP is still $1,980 MSRP, while Xeon Silver 4109T mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
  • 50% higher power demand at 105W vs 70W.

Xeon Silver 4109T

2017

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +5.4% higher average FPS across 43 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Draws 70W instead of 105W, a 35W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (10,348 vs 10,376).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (11 MB vs 18 MB).

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon Silver 4109T better than Xeon E7540?
It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Xeon Silver 4109T is ahead with a 5.4% average FPS lead across 43 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E7540 pulls ahead with 0.3% better PassMark. Xeon E7540 also has the bigger cache pool with 63.6% larger total L3 cache (18 MB vs 11 MB).
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E7540 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 63.6% larger total L3 cache (18 MB vs 11 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Xeon Silver 4109T is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon E7540 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Xeon Silver 4109T comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $1,980 MSRP, and it still gives you a 5.4% average FPS lead across 43 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Xeon E7540 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.3% better PassMark. Xeon E7540 is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (5.2 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Xeon Silver 4109T makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2010). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Xeon E7540 vs Xeon Silver 4109T Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Xeon E7540

The Xeon E7540 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2.27 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB L3 Cache. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1567. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 10,376 points. Launch price was $800.

Intel

Xeon Silver 4109T

The Xeon Silver 4109T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 July 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 11 MB. L2 cache: 8 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 70 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 10,348 points. Launch price was $501.

Processing Power

The Xeon E7540 packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon Silver 4109T offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon Silver 4109T has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.27 GHz on the Xeon E7540 versus 3 GHz on the Xeon Silver 4109T — a 27.7% clock advantage for the Xeon Silver 4109T (base: 2 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Xeon Silver 4109T is built on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. In PassMark, the Xeon E7540 scores 10,376 against the Xeon Silver 4109T's 10,348 — a 0.3% lead for the Xeon E7540. L3 cache: 18 MB L3 Cache on the Xeon E7540 vs 11 MB on the Xeon Silver 4109T.

FeatureXeon E7540Xeon Silver 4109T
Cores / Threads
6 / 12
8 / 16+33%
Boost Clock
2.27 GHz
3 GHz+32%
Base Clock
2 GHz
2 GHz
L3 Cache
18 MB L3 Cache+64%
11 MB
L2 Cache
8 MB
Process
45 nm
14 nm-69%
Architecture
Skylake (server) (2017−2018)
PassMark
10,376
10,348
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon E7540 uses the LGA1567 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Xeon Silver 4109T uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureXeon E7540Xeon Silver 4109T
Socket
LGA1567
LGA3647
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1066
Max RAM Capacity
2 TB
RAM Channels
4
ECC Support
Yes
PCIe Lanes
32
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Xeon E7540) / not specified (Xeon Silver 4109T). Primary use case: Xeon E7540 targets Server.

FeatureXeon E7540Xeon Silver 4109T
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Server