Xeon Gold 5218T vs Xeon Gold 6130

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon Gold 5218T vs Xeon Gold 6130 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon Gold 5218T vs Xeon Gold 6130: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon Gold 5218T

2019

Why buy it

✅Draws 105W instead of 125W, a 20W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (21,433 vs 21,500).
❌Launch MSRP is still $1,572 MSRP, while Xeon Gold 6130 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Xeon Gold 6130

2017

Why buy it

✅+0.3% higher PassMark.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.

Trade-offs

❌19% higher power demand at 125W vs 105W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon Gold 5218T better than Xeon Gold 6130?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Xeon Gold 5218T is ahead with a 2.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Gold 6130 pulls ahead with 0.3% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Gold 6130 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 32 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon Gold 5218T is the better buy right now. Xeon Gold 5218T comes in at an unclear MSRP at $1,572 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Xeon Gold 6130 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.3% better PassMark. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (13.6 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon Gold 5218T makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2017). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Xeon Gold 5218T vs Xeon Gold 6130 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon Gold 5218T

The Xeon Gold 5218T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 22 MB. L2 cache: 16 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2667. Passmark benchmark score: 21,433 points. Launch price was $1,561.

Xeon Gold 6130

The Xeon Gold 6130 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 25 April 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 22 MB. L2 cache: 16 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 21,500 points. Launch price was $1,894.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Xeon Gold 5218T and Xeon Gold 6130 share an identical 16-core/32-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the Xeon Gold 5218T versus 3.7 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6130 — a 2.7% clock advantage for the Xeon Gold 5218T (base: 2.1 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Xeon Gold 5218T uses the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6130 uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon Gold 5218T scores 21,433 against the Xeon Gold 6130's 21,500 — a 0.3% lead for the Xeon Gold 6130. Both processors carry 22 MB of L3 cache.

Feature	Xeon Gold 5218T	Xeon Gold 6130
Cores / Threads	16 / 32	16 / 32
Boost Clock	3.8 GHz+3%	3.7 GHz
Base Clock	2.1 GHz	2.1 GHz
L3 Cache	22 MB	22 MB
L2 Cache	16 MB	16 MB
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Cascade Lake (2019−2020)	Skylake (server) (2017−2018)
PassMark	21,433	21,500
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	18,500
Geekbench 6 Single	—	1,029
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	7,545

🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the LGA3647 socket with PCIe 3.0.

Feature	Xeon Gold 5218T	Xeon Gold 6130
Socket	LGA3647	LGA3647
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	—	DDR4-2666
Max RAM Capacity	—	768 GB
RAM Channels	—	6
ECC Support	—	Yes
PCIe Lanes	—	48

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Xeon Gold 5218T) / VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon Gold 6130). Primary use case: Xeon Gold 6130 targets Server / Enterprise computing. Direct competitor: Xeon Gold 6130 rivals EPYC 7301.