
Xeon E5-2697A v4
Popular choices:

Xeon Gold 5218T
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Xeon E5-2697A v4
2016Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +13.0% higher average FPS across 36 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+81.8% larger total L3 cache (40 MB vs 22 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 7.5 vs 13.6 PassMark/$ ($2,891 MSRP vs $1,572 MSRP).
- ❌38.1% higher power demand at 145W vs 105W.
Xeon Gold 5218T
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,319 less on MSRP ($1,572 MSRP vs $2,891 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 82.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 13.6 vs 7.5 PassMark/$ ($1,572 MSRP vs $2,891 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 105W instead of 145W, a 40W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-2697A v4 across 36 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (21,433 vs 21,621).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (22 MB vs 40 MB).
Xeon E5-2697A v4
2016Xeon Gold 5218T
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +13.0% higher average FPS across 36 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+81.8% larger total L3 cache (40 MB vs 22 MB).
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,319 less on MSRP ($1,572 MSRP vs $2,891 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 82.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 13.6 vs 7.5 PassMark/$ ($1,572 MSRP vs $2,891 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 105W instead of 145W, a 40W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 7.5 vs 13.6 PassMark/$ ($2,891 MSRP vs $1,572 MSRP).
- ❌38.1% higher power demand at 145W vs 105W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-2697A v4 across 36 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (21,433 vs 21,621).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (22 MB vs 40 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon E5-2697A v4 better than Xeon Gold 5218T?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Xeon E5-2697A v4 | Xeon Gold 5218T |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 182 FPS | 185 FPS |
| medium | 158 FPS | 148 FPS |
| high | 126 FPS | 119 FPS |
| ultra | 101 FPS | 93 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 152 FPS | 147 FPS |
| medium | 128 FPS | 116 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 80 FPS | 72 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 69 FPS | 68 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 57 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 39 FPS | 36 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Xeon E5-2697A v4 | Xeon Gold 5218T |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 364 FPS | 212 FPS |
| medium | 330 FPS | 186 FPS |
| high | 279 FPS | 160 FPS |
| ultra | 224 FPS | 135 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 313 FPS | 183 FPS |
| medium | 284 FPS | 165 FPS |
| high | 242 FPS | 142 FPS |
| ultra | 188 FPS | 119 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 195 FPS | 118 FPS |
| medium | 178 FPS | 107 FPS |
| high | 153 FPS | 98 FPS |
| ultra | 120 FPS | 81 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Xeon E5-2697A v4 | Xeon Gold 5218T |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 541 FPS | 536 FPS |
| medium | 541 FPS | 536 FPS |
| high | 541 FPS | 495 FPS |
| ultra | 541 FPS | 429 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 541 FPS | 536 FPS |
| medium | 541 FPS | 449 FPS |
| high | 541 FPS | 408 FPS |
| ultra | 532 FPS | 354 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 466 FPS | 399 FPS |
| medium | 379 FPS | 314 FPS |
| high | 345 FPS | 281 FPS |
| ultra | 289 FPS | 226 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Xeon E5-2697A v4 | Xeon Gold 5218T |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 541 FPS | 536 FPS |
| medium | 541 FPS | 536 FPS |
| high | 541 FPS | 536 FPS |
| ultra | 541 FPS | 536 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 541 FPS | 536 FPS |
| medium | 541 FPS | 536 FPS |
| high | 541 FPS | 536 FPS |
| ultra | 497 FPS | 468 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 541 FPS | 500 FPS |
| medium | 515 FPS | 449 FPS |
| high | 455 FPS | 400 FPS |
| ultra | 381 FPS | 345 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon E5-2697A v4 and Xeon Gold 5218T

Xeon E5-2697A v4
Xeon E5-2697A v4
The Xeon E5-2697A v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 40 MB. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 145 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 21,621 points. Launch price was $2,891.

Xeon Gold 5218T
Xeon Gold 5218T
The Xeon Gold 5218T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 22 MB. L2 cache: 16 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2667. Passmark benchmark score: 21,433 points. Launch price was $1,561.
Processing Power
Both the Xeon E5-2697A v4 and Xeon Gold 5218T share an identical 16-core/32-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the Xeon E5-2697A v4 versus 3.8 GHz on the Xeon Gold 5218T — a 5.4% clock advantage for the Xeon Gold 5218T (base: 2.6 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Xeon E5-2697A v4 uses the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon Gold 5218T uses Cascade Lake (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E5-2697A v4 scores 21,621 against the Xeon Gold 5218T's 21,433 — a 0.9% lead for the Xeon E5-2697A v4. L3 cache: 40 MB on the Xeon E5-2697A v4 vs 22 MB on the Xeon Gold 5218T.
| Feature | Xeon E5-2697A v4 | Xeon Gold 5218T |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 32 | 16 / 32 |
| Boost Clock | 3.6 GHz | 3.8 GHz+6% |
| Base Clock | 2.6 GHz+24% | 2.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 40 MB+82% | 22 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 16 MB+300% |
| Process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Broadwell (2015−2019) | Cascade Lake (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 21,621 | 21,433 |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon E5-2697A v4 uses the LGA2011 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon Gold 5218T uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Xeon E5-2697A v4 | Xeon Gold 5218T |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA2011 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
Value Analysis
The Xeon E5-2697A v4 launched at $2891 MSRP, while the Xeon Gold 5218T debuted at $1572. On MSRP ($2891 vs $1572), the Xeon Gold 5218T is $1319 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon E5-2697A v4 delivers 7.5 pts/$ vs 13.6 pts/$ for the Xeon Gold 5218T — making the Xeon Gold 5218T the 58.3% better value option.
| Feature | Xeon E5-2697A v4 | Xeon Gold 5218T |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2891 | $1572-46% |
| Performance per Dollar | 7.5 | 13.6+81% |
| Release Date | 2016 | 2019 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












