
Xeon E5-2697A v4

Xeon Gold 5218
Xeon E5-2697A v4 vs Xeon Gold 5218 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Xeon E5-2697A v4 vs Xeon Gold 5218 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Xeon E5-2697A v4 vs Xeon Gold 5218: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Xeon E5-2697A v4
2016Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +9.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+81.8% larger total L3 cache (40 MB vs 22 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 7.5 vs 17.0 PassMark/$ ($2,891 MSRP vs $1,273 MSRP).
- ❌16% higher power demand at 145W vs 125W.
- ❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.
Xeon Gold 5218
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,618 less on MSRP ($1,273 MSRP vs $2,891 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 126.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 17.0 vs 7.5 PassMark/$ ($1,273 MSRP vs $2,891 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 125W instead of 145W, a 20W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-2697A v4 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (21,586 vs 21,621).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (22 MB vs 40 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon E5-2697A v4 better than Xeon Gold 5218?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Xeon E5-2697A v4 vs Xeon Gold 5218 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon E5-2697A v4
The Xeon E5-2697A v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 40 MB. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 145 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 21,621 points. Launch price was $2,891.

Xeon Gold 5218
The Xeon Gold 5218 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 22 MB. L2 cache: 16 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2667. Passmark benchmark score: 21,586 points. Launch price was $1,273.
Processing Power
Both the Xeon E5-2697A v4 and Xeon Gold 5218 share an identical 16-core/32-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the Xeon E5-2697A v4 versus 3.9 GHz on the Xeon Gold 5218 — a 8% clock advantage for the Xeon Gold 5218 (base: 2.6 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The Xeon E5-2697A v4 uses the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon Gold 5218 uses Cascade Lake (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E5-2697A v4 scores 21,621 against the Xeon Gold 5218's 21,586 — a 0.2% lead for the Xeon E5-2697A v4. L3 cache: 40 MB on the Xeon E5-2697A v4 vs 22 MB on the Xeon Gold 5218.
| Feature | Xeon E5-2697A v4 | Xeon Gold 5218 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 32 | 16 / 32 |
| Boost Clock | 3.6 GHz | 3.9 GHz+8% |
| Base Clock | 2.6 GHz+13% | 2.3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 40 MB+82% | 22 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 16 MB+300% |
| Process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Broadwell (2015−2019) | Cascade Lake (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 21,621 | 21,586 |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon E5-2697A v4 uses the LGA2011 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon Gold 5218 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Xeon E5-2697A v4 | Xeon Gold 5218 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA2011 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | 2666 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 768 |
| RAM Channels | — | 6 |
| ECC Support | — | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 48 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Xeon E5-2697A v4) / VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Gold 5218).
| Feature | Xeon E5-2697A v4 | Xeon Gold 5218 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | No |
| IGPU Model | — | None |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | Yes |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x, VT-d |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Xeon E5-2697A v4 was priced at $2891, while the Xeon Gold 5218 came in at $1273. On launch pricing ($2891 vs $1273), Xeon Gold 5218 was $1618 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon E5-2697A v4 delivers 7.5 pts/$ vs 17.0 pts/$ for the Xeon Gold 5218 — making the Xeon Gold 5218 the 77.6% better value option.
| Feature | Xeon E5-2697A v4 | Xeon Gold 5218 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2891 | $1273-56% |
| Performance per Dollar | 7.5 | 17.0+127% |
| Release Date | 2016 | 2019 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














