Xeon E5-2697A v4 vs Xeon Gold 6130T

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon E5-2697A v4 vs Xeon Gold 6130T FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon E5-2697A v4 vs Xeon Gold 6130T: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon E5-2697A v4

2016

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +14.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+81.8% larger total L3 cache (40 MB vs 22 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (21,621 vs 21,804).
❌Launch MSRP is still $2,891 MSRP, while Xeon Gold 6130T mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌16% higher power demand at 145W vs 125W.

Xeon Gold 6130T

2017

Why buy it

✅+0.8% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 125W instead of 145W, a 20W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-2697A v4 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (22 MB vs 40 MB).

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon Gold 6130T better than Xeon E5-2697A v4?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Xeon E5-2697A v4 is ahead with a 14.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Gold 6130T pulls ahead with 0.8% better PassMark. Xeon E5-2697A v4 also has the bigger cache pool with 81.8% larger total L3 cache (40 MB vs 22 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Gold 6130T is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 32 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon Gold 6130T is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon E5-2697A v4 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Xeon Gold 6130T comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $2,891 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.8% better PassMark. The compromise is that Xeon E5-2697A v4 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 14.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Xeon E5-2697A v4 is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (7.5 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon Gold 6130T makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2016) and more multi-core headroom with 16 cores / 32 threads instead of 16/32. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Xeon E5-2697A v4 vs Xeon Gold 6130T Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon E5-2697A v4

The Xeon E5-2697A v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 40 MB. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 145 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 21,621 points. Launch price was $2,891.

Xeon Gold 6130T

The Xeon Gold 6130T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 July 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 22 MB. L2 cache: 16 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 21,804 points. Launch price was $1,988.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Xeon E5-2697A v4 and Xeon Gold 6130T share an identical 16-core/32-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the Xeon E5-2697A v4 versus 3.7 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6130T — a 2.7% clock advantage for the Xeon Gold 6130T (base: 2.6 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Xeon E5-2697A v4 uses the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6130T uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E5-2697A v4 scores 21,621 against the Xeon Gold 6130T's 21,804 — a 0.8% lead for the Xeon Gold 6130T. L3 cache: 40 MB on the Xeon E5-2697A v4 vs 22 MB on the Xeon Gold 6130T.

Feature	Xeon E5-2697A v4	Xeon Gold 6130T
Cores / Threads	16 / 32	16 / 32
Boost Clock	3.6 GHz	3.7 GHz+3%
Base Clock	2.6 GHz+24%	2.1 GHz
L3 Cache	40 MB+82%	22 MB
L2 Cache	4 MB	16 MB+300%
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Broadwell (2015−2019)	Skylake (server) (2017−2018)
PassMark	21,621	21,804

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon E5-2697A v4 uses the LGA2011 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon Gold 6130T uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.