Xeon Gold 5315Y vs Xeon Gold 6334

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon Gold 5315Y vs Xeon Gold 6334 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon Gold 5315Y vs Xeon Gold 6334: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon Gold 5315Y

2021

Why buy it

✅Draws 140W instead of 165W, a 25W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Gold 6334 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (20,477 vs 20,512).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 18 MB).

Xeon Gold 6334

2021

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +5.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+50% larger total L3 cache (18 MB vs 12 MB).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌17.9% higher power demand at 165W vs 140W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon Gold 6334 better than Xeon Gold 5315Y?

Yes. Xeon Gold 6334 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 5.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.2% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon Gold 6334 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 5.4% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Gold 6334 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (18 MB vs 12 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon Gold 6334 still makes the most sense overall. Xeon Gold 6334 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 5.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon Gold 6334 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting 50% larger total L3 cache (18 MB vs 12 MB), more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 8/16, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Xeon Gold 5315Y vs Xeon Gold 6334 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon Gold 5315Y

The Xeon Gold 5315Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 140 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 20,477 points. Launch price was $800.

Xeon Gold 6334

The Xeon Gold 6334 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 165 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 20,512 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Xeon Gold 5315Y and Xeon Gold 6334 share an identical 8-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the Xeon Gold 5315Y versus 3.7 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6334 — a 2.7% clock advantage for the Xeon Gold 6334 (base: 3.2 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). Both are built on the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture using a 10 nm process. In PassMark, the Xeon Gold 5315Y scores 20,477 against the Xeon Gold 6334's 20,512 — a 0.2% lead for the Xeon Gold 6334. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Xeon Gold 5315Y vs 18 MB (total) on the Xeon Gold 6334.

Feature	Xeon Gold 5315Y	Xeon Gold 6334
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	8 / 16
Boost Clock	3.6 GHz	3.7 GHz+3%
Base Clock	3.2 GHz	3.6 GHz+12%
L3 Cache	12 MB (total)	18 MB (total)+50%
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	1 MB (per core)
Process	10 nm	10 nm
Architecture	Ice Lake-SP (2021)	Ice Lake-SP (2021)
PassMark	20,477	20,512