EPYC 8024P vs Xeon Gold 5315Y

EPYC 8024P vs Xeon Gold 5315Y Performance Spectrum

EPYC 8024P

8 / 16

20,455

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 3960X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Xeon Gold 5315Y

8 / 16

20,477

+0.1%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 8024P vs Xeon Gold 5315Y FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 8024P vs Xeon Gold 5315Y: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 8024P

2023

Why buy it

✅+166.7% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 12 MB).
✅Draws 90W instead of 140W, a 50W reduction.
✅Newer platform on SP6 with DDR5 support instead of LGA4189 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (20,455 vs 20,477).

Xeon Gold 5315Y

2021

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 32 MB).
❌55.6% higher power demand at 140W vs 90W.
❌Older platform position on LGA4189 with DDR4, while EPYC 8024P moves to SP6 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon Gold 5315Y better than EPYC 8024P?

Yes. Xeon Gold 5315Y is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 2.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.1% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon Gold 5315Y is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 2.0% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Gold 5315Y is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon Gold 5315Y still makes the most sense overall. Xeon Gold 5315Y comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 8024P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2021), a healthier platform with SP6 and DDR5 instead of LGA4189, and 166.7% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 12 MB). That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

EPYC 8024P vs Xeon Gold 5315Y Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 8024P

The EPYC 8024P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 18 September 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Siena (2023−2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: SP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 90 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 20,455 points. Launch price was $409.

Xeon Gold 5315Y

The Xeon Gold 5315Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 140 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 20,477 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the EPYC 8024P and Xeon Gold 5315Y share an identical 8-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the EPYC 8024P versus 3.6 GHz on the Xeon Gold 5315Y — a 18.2% clock advantage for the Xeon Gold 5315Y (base: 2.4 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The EPYC 8024P uses the Siena (2023−2024) architecture (5 nm), while the Xeon Gold 5315Y uses Ice Lake-SP (2021) (10 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 8024P scores 20,455 against the Xeon Gold 5315Y's 20,477 — a 0.1% lead for the Xeon Gold 5315Y. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the EPYC 8024P vs 12 MB (total) on the Xeon Gold 5315Y.

Feature	EPYC 8024P	Xeon Gold 5315Y
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	8 / 16
Boost Clock	3 GHz	3.6 GHz+20%
Base Clock	2.4 GHz	3.2 GHz+33%
L3 Cache	32 MB (total)+167%	12 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	1 MB (per core)
Process	5 nm-50%	10 nm
Architecture	Siena (2023−2024)	Ice Lake-SP (2021)
PassMark	20,455	20,477

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 8024P uses the SP6 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 5315Y uses LGA4189 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.