EPYC 8024P vs Xeon W-2150B

EPYC 8024P vs Xeon W-2150B Performance Spectrum

EPYC 8024P

8 / 16

20,455

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 3960X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Xeon W-2150B

10 / 20

20,486

+0.2%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 8024P vs Xeon W-2150B FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 8024P vs Xeon W-2150B: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 8024P

2023

Why buy it

✅+132.7% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 14 MB).
✅Draws 90W instead of 120W, a 30W reduction.
✅Newer platform on SP6 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2066 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon W-2150B across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (20,455 vs 20,486).
❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Xeon W-2150B

2017

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +7.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (14 MB vs 32 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $499 MSRP, while EPYC 8024P mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌33.3% higher power demand at 120W vs 90W.
❌Older platform position on LGA2066 with DDR4, while EPYC 8024P moves to SP6 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon W-2150B better than EPYC 8024P?

Yes. Xeon W-2150B is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 7.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.2% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon W-2150B is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 7.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon W-2150B is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 10 cores and 20 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon W-2150B is the better buy right now. Xeon W-2150B comes in at an unclear MSRP at $499 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 7.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (41.1 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 8024P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2017), a healthier platform with SP6 and DDR5 instead of LGA2066, and 132.7% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 14 MB). That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

EPYC 8024P vs Xeon W-2150B Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 8024P

The EPYC 8024P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 18 September 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Siena (2023−2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: SP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 90 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 20,455 points. Launch price was $409.

Xeon W-2150B

The Xeon W-2150B is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 13.75 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2066. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 20,486 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 8024P packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon W-2150B offers 10 cores / 20 threads — the Xeon W-2150B has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the EPYC 8024P versus 4.5 GHz on the Xeon W-2150B — a 40% clock advantage for the Xeon W-2150B (base: 2.4 GHz vs 3 GHz). The EPYC 8024P uses the Siena (2023−2024) architecture (5 nm), while the Xeon W-2150B uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 8024P scores 20,455 against the Xeon W-2150B's 20,486 — a 0.2% lead for the Xeon W-2150B. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the EPYC 8024P vs 13.75 MB (total) on the Xeon W-2150B.

Feature	EPYC 8024P	Xeon W-2150B
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	10 / 20+25%
Boost Clock	3 GHz	4.5 GHz+50%
Base Clock	2.4 GHz	3 GHz+25%
L3 Cache	32 MB (total)+133%	13.75 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	1 MB (per core)
Process	5 nm-64%	14 nm
Architecture	Siena (2023−2024)	Skylake (server) (2017−2018)
PassMark	20,455	20,486
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	11,463
Geekbench 6 Single	—	1,410
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	8,324

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 8024P uses the SP6 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon W-2150B uses LGA2066 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.