EPYC 8024P vs Xeon Gold 6250

EPYC 8024P vs Xeon Gold 6250 Performance Spectrum

EPYC 8024P

8 / 16

20,455

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 3960X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Xeon Gold 6250

8 / 16

20,552

+0.5%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 8024P vs Xeon Gold 6250 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 8024P vs Xeon Gold 6250: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 8024P

2023

Why buy it

✅Draws 90W instead of 185W, a 95W reduction.
✅Newer platform on SP6 with DDR5 support instead of LGA3647 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Gold 6250 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (20,455 vs 20,552).

Xeon Gold 6250

2020

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +22.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $3,400 MSRP, while EPYC 8024P mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌105.6% higher power demand at 185W vs 90W.
❌Older platform position on LGA3647 with DDR4, while EPYC 8024P moves to SP6 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon Gold 6250 better than EPYC 8024P?

Yes. Xeon Gold 6250 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 22.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.5% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon Gold 6250 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 22.4% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Gold 6250 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon Gold 6250 is the better buy right now. Xeon Gold 6250 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $3,400 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 22.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (6.0 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 8024P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2020) and a healthier platform with SP6 and DDR5 instead of LGA3647. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

EPYC 8024P vs Xeon Gold 6250 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 8024P

The EPYC 8024P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 18 September 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Siena (2023−2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: SP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 90 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 20,455 points. Launch price was $409.

Xeon Gold 6250

The Xeon Gold 6250 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 35.75 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 185 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 20,552 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the EPYC 8024P and Xeon Gold 6250 share an identical 8-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the EPYC 8024P versus 4.5 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6250 — a 40% clock advantage for the Xeon Gold 6250 (base: 2.4 GHz vs 3.9 GHz). The EPYC 8024P is built on the Siena (2023−2024) architecture. In PassMark, the EPYC 8024P scores 20,455 against the Xeon Gold 6250's 20,552 — a 0.5% lead for the Xeon Gold 6250. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the EPYC 8024P vs 35.75 MB on the Xeon Gold 6250.

Feature	EPYC 8024P	Xeon Gold 6250
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	8 / 16
Boost Clock	3 GHz	4.5 GHz+50%
Base Clock	2.4 GHz	3.9 GHz+63%
L3 Cache	32 MB (total)	35.75 MB+12%
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	—
Process	5 nm-64%	14 nm
Architecture	Siena (2023−2024)	—
PassMark	20,455	20,552

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 8024P uses the SP6 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 6250 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.