EPYC 8024P vs Xeon Gold 6138T

EPYC 8024P vs Xeon Gold 6138T Performance Spectrum

EPYC 8024P

8 / 16

20,455

+0.5%

Ryzen Threadripper 3960X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Xeon Gold 6138T

20 / 40

20,356

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 8024P vs Xeon Gold 6138T FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 8024P vs Xeon Gold 6138T: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 8024P

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 90W instead of 125W, a 35W reduction.
✅Newer platform on SP6 with DDR5 support instead of LGA3647 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Xeon Gold 6138T

2017

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 8024P across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (20,356 vs 20,455).
❌Launch MSRP is still $2,742 MSRP, while EPYC 8024P mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌38.9% higher power demand at 125W vs 90W.
❌Older platform position on LGA3647 with DDR4, while EPYC 8024P moves to SP6 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 8024P better than Xeon Gold 6138T?

Yes. EPYC 8024P is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 4.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.5% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, EPYC 8024P is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 4.7% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 8024P is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 8024P is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon Gold 6138T is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. EPYC 8024P comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $2,742 MSRP, and it still gives you a 4.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Xeon Gold 6138T is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (7.4 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 8024P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2017), a healthier platform with SP6 and DDR5 instead of LGA3647, and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 20/40. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

EPYC 8024P vs Xeon Gold 6138T Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 8024P

The EPYC 8024P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 18 September 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Siena (2023−2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: SP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 90 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 20,455 points. Launch price was $409.

Xeon Gold 6138T

The Xeon Gold 6138T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 25 April 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 20 cores and 40 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 27.5 MB. L2 cache: 20 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 20,356 points. Launch price was $2,742.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 8024P packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6138T offers 20 cores / 40 threads — the Xeon Gold 6138T has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the EPYC 8024P versus 3.7 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6138T — a 20.9% clock advantage for the Xeon Gold 6138T (base: 2.4 GHz vs 2 GHz). The EPYC 8024P uses the Siena (2023−2024) architecture (5 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6138T uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 8024P scores 20,455 against the Xeon Gold 6138T's 20,356 — a 0.5% lead for the EPYC 8024P. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the EPYC 8024P vs 27.5 MB on the Xeon Gold 6138T.

Feature	EPYC 8024P	Xeon Gold 6138T
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	20 / 40+150%
Boost Clock	3 GHz	3.7 GHz+23%
Base Clock	2.4 GHz+20%	2 GHz
L3 Cache	32 MB (total)+16%	27.5 MB
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	20 MB+1900%
Process	5 nm-64%	14 nm
Architecture	Siena (2023−2024)	Skylake (server) (2017−2018)
PassMark	20,455	20,356
Geekbench 6 Single	—	1,030
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	11,988

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 8024P uses the SP6 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 6138T uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.