EPYC 8024P vs Xeon E5-4667 v4

EPYC 8024P vs Xeon E5-4667 v4 Performance Spectrum

EPYC 8024P

8 / 16

20,455

+0.7%

Ryzen Threadripper 3960X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Xeon E5-4667 v4

18 / 36

20,319

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 8024P vs Xeon E5-4667 v4 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 8024P vs Xeon E5-4667 v4: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 8024P

2023

Why buy it

✅+0.7% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 90W instead of 135W, a 45W reduction.
✅Newer platform on SP6 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2011 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 45 MB).

Xeon E5-4667 v4

2016

Why buy it

✅+40.6% larger total L3 cache (45 MB vs 32 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (20,319 vs 20,455).
❌50% higher power demand at 135W vs 90W.
❌Older platform position on LGA2011 with DDR4, while EPYC 8024P moves to SP6 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 8024P better than Xeon E5-4667 v4?

Yes. EPYC 8024P is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 1.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.7% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

For gaming, this matchup is basically a tie in the data we have.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 8024P is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 8024P still makes the most sense overall. EPYC 8024P comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 8024P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2016), a healthier platform with SP6 and DDR5 instead of LGA2011, and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 18/36. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

EPYC 8024P vs Xeon E5-4667 v4 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 8024P

The EPYC 8024P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 18 September 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Siena (2023−2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: SP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 90 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 20,455 points. Launch price was $409.

Xeon E5-4667 v4

The Xeon E5-4667 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 18 cores and 36 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 45 MB. L2 cache: 4.5 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 135 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 20,319 points. Launch price was $5,729.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 8024P packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon E5-4667 v4 offers 18 cores / 36 threads — the Xeon E5-4667 v4 has 10 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the EPYC 8024P versus 3 GHz on the Xeon E5-4667 v4 — identical boost frequencies (base: 2.4 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The EPYC 8024P uses the Siena (2023−2024) architecture (5 nm), while the Xeon E5-4667 v4 uses Broadwell (2015−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 8024P scores 20,455 against the Xeon E5-4667 v4's 20,319 — a 0.7% lead for the EPYC 8024P. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the EPYC 8024P vs 45 MB on the Xeon E5-4667 v4.

Feature	EPYC 8024P	Xeon E5-4667 v4
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	18 / 36+125%
Boost Clock	3 GHz	3 GHz
Base Clock	2.4 GHz+9%	2.2 GHz
L3 Cache	32 MB (total)	45 MB+41%
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	4.5 MB+350%
Process	5 nm-64%	14 nm
Architecture	Siena (2023−2024)	Broadwell (2015−2019)
PassMark	20,455	20,319

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 8024P uses the SP6 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E5-4667 v4 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.