EPYC 8024P vs Xeon Gold 6334

EPYC 8024P vs Xeon Gold 6334 Performance Spectrum

EPYC 8024P

8 / 16

20,455

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 3960X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Xeon Gold 6334

8 / 16

20,512

+0.3%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 8024P vs Xeon Gold 6334 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 8024P vs Xeon Gold 6334: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 8024P

2023

Why buy it

✅+77.8% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 18 MB).
✅Draws 90W instead of 165W, a 75W reduction.
✅Newer platform on SP6 with DDR5 support instead of LGA4189 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Gold 6334 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (20,455 vs 20,512).
❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Xeon Gold 6334

2021

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +7.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (18 MB vs 32 MB).
❌83.3% higher power demand at 165W vs 90W.
❌Older platform position on LGA4189 with DDR4, while EPYC 8024P moves to SP6 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon Gold 6334 better than EPYC 8024P?

Yes. Xeon Gold 6334 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 7.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.3% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon Gold 6334 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 7.5% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Gold 6334 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon Gold 6334 still makes the most sense overall. Xeon Gold 6334 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 7.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 8024P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2021), a healthier platform with SP6 and DDR5 instead of LGA4189, and 77.8% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 18 MB). That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

EPYC 8024P vs Xeon Gold 6334 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 8024P

The EPYC 8024P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 18 September 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Siena (2023−2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: SP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 90 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 20,455 points. Launch price was $409.

Xeon Gold 6334

The Xeon Gold 6334 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 165 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 20,512 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the EPYC 8024P and Xeon Gold 6334 share an identical 8-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the EPYC 8024P versus 3.7 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6334 — a 20.9% clock advantage for the Xeon Gold 6334 (base: 2.4 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The EPYC 8024P uses the Siena (2023−2024) architecture (5 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6334 uses Ice Lake-SP (2021) (10 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 8024P scores 20,455 against the Xeon Gold 6334's 20,512 — a 0.3% lead for the Xeon Gold 6334. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the EPYC 8024P vs 18 MB (total) on the Xeon Gold 6334.

Feature	EPYC 8024P	Xeon Gold 6334
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	8 / 16
Boost Clock	3 GHz	3.7 GHz+23%
Base Clock	2.4 GHz	3.6 GHz+50%
L3 Cache	32 MB (total)+78%	18 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	1 MB (per core)
Process	5 nm-50%	10 nm
Architecture	Siena (2023−2024)	Ice Lake-SP (2021)
PassMark	20,455	20,512

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 8024P uses the SP6 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 6334 uses LGA4189 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.