Core i9-13900TE vs EPYC 8024P

Core i9-13900TE vs EPYC 8024P Performance Spectrum

Core i9-13900TE

24 / 32

20,602

+0.7%

20,455

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 3960X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i9-13900TE vs EPYC 8024P FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i9-13900TE vs EPYC 8024P: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i9-13900TE

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +27.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 35W instead of 90W, a 55W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 770, while EPYC 8024P needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $554 MSRP, while EPYC 8024P mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

EPYC 8024P

2023

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-13900TE across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (20,455 vs 20,602).
❌157.1% higher power demand at 90W vs 35W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i9-13900TE can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i9-13900TE better than EPYC 8024P?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. EPYC 8024P makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i9-13900TE is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i9-13900TE is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 27.9% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i9-13900TE is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 24 cores and 32 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i9-13900TE is the better buy right now. Core i9-13900TE comes in at an unclear MSRP at $554 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 27.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (37.2 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i9-13900TE makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 24 cores / 32 threads instead of 8/16 and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i9-13900TE vs EPYC 8024P Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i9-13900TE

The Core i9-13900TE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 24 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 1 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 36 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 20,602 points. Launch price was $299.

EPYC 8024P

The EPYC 8024P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 18 September 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Siena (2023−2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: SP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 90 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 20,455 points. Launch price was $409.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i9-13900TE packs 24 cores / 32 threads, while the EPYC 8024P offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i9-13900TE has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Core i9-13900TE versus 3 GHz on the EPYC 8024P — a 50% clock advantage for the Core i9-13900TE (base: 1 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Core i9-13900TE uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (10 nm), while the EPYC 8024P uses Siena (2023−2024) (5 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-13900TE scores 20,602 against the EPYC 8024P's 20,455 — a 0.7% lead for the Core i9-13900TE. L3 cache: 36 MB (total) on the Core i9-13900TE vs 32 MB (total) on the EPYC 8024P.

Feature	Core i9-13900TE	EPYC 8024P
Cores / Threads	24 / 32+200%	8 / 16
Boost Clock	5 GHz+67%	3 GHz
Base Clock	1 GHz	2.4 GHz+140%
L3 Cache	36 MB (total)+13%	32 MB (total)
L2 Cache	2 MB (per core)+100%	1 MB (per core)
Process	10 nm	5 nm-50%
Architecture	Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)	Siena (2023−2024)
PassMark	20,602	20,455

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i9-13900TE uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the EPYC 8024P uses SP6 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i9-13900TE	EPYC 8024P
Socket	LGA1700	SP6
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-5600	—
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	Yes	—
PCIe Lanes	20	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i9-13900TE) / not specified (EPYC 8024P). The Core i9-13900TE includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 770), while the EPYC 8024P requires a dedicated GPU.