
Core i9-13900TE

Xeon Gold 6250
Core i9-13900TE vs Xeon Gold 6250 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i9-13900TE vs Xeon Gold 6250 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i9-13900TE vs Xeon Gold 6250: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i9-13900TE
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +4.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $2,846 less on MSRP ($554 MSRP vs $3,400 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 515.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 37.2 vs 6.0 PassMark/$ ($554 MSRP vs $3,400 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 185W, a 150W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA3647 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Xeon Gold 6250
2020Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-13900TE across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (20,552 vs 20,602).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 6.0 vs 37.2 PassMark/$ ($3,400 MSRP vs $554 MSRP).
- ❌428.6% higher power demand at 185W vs 35W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA3647 with DDR4, while Core i9-13900TE moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i9-13900TE better than Xeon Gold 6250?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i9-13900TE vs Xeon Gold 6250 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i9-13900TE
The Core i9-13900TE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 24 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 1 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 36 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 20,602 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon Gold 6250
The Xeon Gold 6250 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 35.75 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 185 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 20,552 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Core i9-13900TE packs 24 cores / 32 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6250 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i9-13900TE has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Core i9-13900TE versus 4.5 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6250 — a 10.5% clock advantage for the Core i9-13900TE (base: 1 GHz vs 3.9 GHz). The Core i9-13900TE is built on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. In PassMark, the Core i9-13900TE scores 20,602 against the Xeon Gold 6250's 20,552 — a 0.2% lead for the Core i9-13900TE. L3 cache: 36 MB (total) on the Core i9-13900TE vs 35.75 MB on the Xeon Gold 6250.
| Feature | Core i9-13900TE | Xeon Gold 6250 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 24 / 32+200% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 5 GHz+11% | 4.5 GHz |
| Base Clock | 1 GHz | 3.9 GHz+290% |
| L3 Cache | 36 MB (total) | 35.75 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core) | — |
| Process | 10 nm-29% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) | — |
| PassMark | 20,602 | 20,552 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i9-13900TE uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon Gold 6250 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i9-13900TE | Xeon Gold 6250 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+67% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5600 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i9-13900TE) / not specified (Xeon Gold 6250). The Core i9-13900TE includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 770), while the Xeon Gold 6250 requires a dedicated GPU.
| Feature | Core i9-13900TE | Xeon Gold 6250 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 770 | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | Yes | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i9-13900TE was priced at $554, while the Xeon Gold 6250 came in at $3400. On launch pricing ($554 vs $3400), Core i9-13900TE was $2846 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i9-13900TE delivers 37.2 pts/$ vs 6.0 pts/$ for the Xeon Gold 6250 — making the Core i9-13900TE the 144.1% better value option.
| Feature | Core i9-13900TE | Xeon Gold 6250 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $554-84% | $3400 |
| Performance per Dollar | 37.2+520% | 6.0 |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2020 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














