Core i9-13900TE vs Xeon E-2456

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i9-13900TE vs Xeon E-2456 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i9-13900TE vs Xeon E-2456: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i9-13900TE

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +13.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (36 MB vs 18 MB).
✅Draws 35W instead of 80W, a 45W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 770, while Xeon E-2456 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (20,602 vs 20,705).
❌Launch MSRP is still $554 MSRP, while Xeon E-2456 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon E-2456

2023

Why buy it

✅+0.5% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-13900TE across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (18 MB vs 36 MB).
❌128.6% higher power demand at 80W vs 35W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i9-13900TE can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i9-13900TE better than Xeon E-2456?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E-2456 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i9-13900TE is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E-2456 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i9-13900TE is the better buy right now. Core i9-13900TE comes in at an unclear MSRP at $554 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 13.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Xeon E-2456 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.5% better PassMark. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (37.2 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i9-13900TE makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting 100% larger total L3 cache (36 MB vs 18 MB) and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i9-13900TE vs Xeon E-2456 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i9-13900TE

The Core i9-13900TE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 24 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 1 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 36 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 20,602 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon E-2456

The Xeon E-2456 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 20,705 points. Launch price was $375.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i9-13900TE packs 24 cores / 32 threads, while the Xeon E-2456 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i9-13900TE has 18 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Core i9-13900TE versus 5.1 GHz on the Xeon E-2456 — a 2% clock advantage for the Xeon E-2456 (base: 1 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). Both are built on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture using a 10 nm process. In PassMark, the Core i9-13900TE scores 20,602 against the Xeon E-2456's 20,705 — a 0.5% lead for the Xeon E-2456. L3 cache: 36 MB (total) on the Core i9-13900TE vs 18 MB (total) on the Xeon E-2456.

Feature	Core i9-13900TE	Xeon E-2456
Cores / Threads	24 / 32+300%	6 / 12
Boost Clock	5 GHz	5.1 GHz+2%
Base Clock	1 GHz	3.3 GHz+230%
L3 Cache	36 MB (total)+100%	18 MB (total)
L2 Cache	2 MB (per core)+60%	1.25 MB (per core)
Process	10 nm	Intel 7 nm-30%
Architecture	Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)	Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
PassMark	20,602	20,705

🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the LGA1700 socket with PCIe 5.0.

Feature	Core i9-13900TE	Xeon E-2456
Socket	LGA1700	LGA1700
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0	PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-5600	—
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	Yes	—
PCIe Lanes	20	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i9-13900TE) / not specified (Xeon E-2456). The Core i9-13900TE includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 770), while the Xeon E-2456 requires a dedicated GPU.