
Xeon Gold 5318H
Popular choices:

Xeon Gold 6210U
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Xeon Gold 5318H
2021Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (1,063 vs 1,234).
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (18,000 vs 19,000).
Xeon Gold 6210U
2019Why buy it
- ✅+16.1% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Xeon Gold 5318H
2021Xeon Gold 6210U
2019Why buy it
Why buy it
- ✅+16.1% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (1,063 vs 1,234).
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (18,000 vs 19,000).
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon Gold 6210U better than Xeon Gold 5318H?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Xeon Gold 5318H | Xeon Gold 6210U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 178 FPS | 186 FPS |
| medium | 143 FPS | 151 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 123 FPS |
| ultra | 91 FPS | 96 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 144 FPS | 146 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 115 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 72 FPS | 72 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 67 FPS | 68 FPS |
| medium | 56 FPS | 57 FPS |
| high | 45 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 36 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Xeon Gold 5318H | Xeon Gold 6210U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 401 FPS | 401 FPS |
| medium | 346 FPS | 349 FPS |
| high | 290 FPS | 290 FPS |
| ultra | 244 FPS | 244 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 347 FPS | 348 FPS |
| medium | 307 FPS | 310 FPS |
| high | 258 FPS | 259 FPS |
| ultra | 215 FPS | 215 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 225 FPS | 227 FPS |
| medium | 200 FPS | 202 FPS |
| high | 179 FPS | 179 FPS |
| ultra | 147 FPS | 147 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Xeon Gold 5318H | Xeon Gold 6210U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 697 FPS | 722 FPS |
| medium | 559 FPS | 722 FPS |
| high | 507 FPS | 722 FPS |
| ultra | 439 FPS | 648 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 557 FPS | 705 FPS |
| medium | 452 FPS | 605 FPS |
| high | 410 FPS | 573 FPS |
| ultra | 355 FPS | 506 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 405 FPS | 455 FPS |
| medium | 314 FPS | 357 FPS |
| high | 281 FPS | 318 FPS |
| ultra | 225 FPS | 259 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Xeon Gold 5318H | Xeon Gold 6210U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 733 FPS | 722 FPS |
| medium | 733 FPS | 722 FPS |
| high | 681 FPS | 663 FPS |
| ultra | 592 FPS | 576 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 700 FPS | 682 FPS |
| medium | 613 FPS | 598 FPS |
| high | 529 FPS | 516 FPS |
| ultra | 454 FPS | 442 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 481 FPS | 469 FPS |
| medium | 432 FPS | 421 FPS |
| high | 386 FPS | 377 FPS |
| ultra | 334 FPS | 327 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon Gold 5318H and Xeon Gold 6210U

Xeon Gold 5318H
Xeon Gold 5318H
The Xeon Gold 5318H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Cooper Lake-SP (2021) architecture. It features 18 cores and 36 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 24.75 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 RDIMM. Passmark benchmark score: 29,301 points. Launch price was $800.

Xeon Gold 6210U
Xeon Gold 6210U
The Xeon Gold 6210U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 20 cores and 40 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 27.5 MB. L2 cache: 20 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 28,861 points. Launch price was $1,500.
Processing Power
The Xeon Gold 5318H packs 18 cores / 36 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6210U offers 20 cores / 40 threads — the Xeon Gold 6210U has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the Xeon Gold 5318H versus 3.9 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6210U — a 2.6% clock advantage for the Xeon Gold 6210U (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Xeon Gold 5318H uses the Cooper Lake-SP (2021) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6210U uses Cascade Lake (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon Gold 5318H scores 29,301 against the Xeon Gold 6210U's 28,861 — a 1.5% lead for the Xeon Gold 5318H. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 18,000 vs 19,000 (5.4% advantage for the Xeon Gold 6210U). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,063 vs 1,234, a 14.9% lead for the Xeon Gold 6210U that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 15,000 vs 10,072 (39.3% advantage for the Xeon Gold 5318H). L3 cache: 24.75 MB (total) on the Xeon Gold 5318H vs 27.5 MB on the Xeon Gold 6210U.
| Feature | Xeon Gold 5318H | Xeon Gold 6210U |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 18 / 36 | 20 / 40+11% |
| Boost Clock | 3.8 GHz | 3.9 GHz+3% |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz | 2.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 24.75 MB (total) | 27.5 MB+11% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 20 MB+1900% |
| Process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Cooper Lake-SP (2021) | Cascade Lake (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 29,301+2% | 28,861 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 18,000 | 19,000+6% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,063 | 1,234+16% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 15,000+49% | 10,072 |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon Gold 5318H uses the LGA4189 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 6210U uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-2667 memory speed. The Xeon Gold 5318H supports up to 1152 GB of RAM compared to 1024 GB — 11.8% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 6-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 48 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: C620 Series (Xeon Gold 5318H) and C620 (Xeon Gold 6210U).
| Feature | Xeon Gold 5318H | Xeon Gold 6210U |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA4189 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2667 | DDR4-2933 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 1152 GB+13% | 1024 GB |
| RAM Channels | 6 | 6 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 48 | 48 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support VT-x, VT-d, EPT virtualization. Primary use case: Xeon Gold 5318H targets Cloud Infrastructure / Virtualization, Xeon Gold 6210U targets High-end Workstation / Cloud Compute. Direct competitor: Xeon Gold 5318H rivals EPYC 7352; Xeon Gold 6210U rivals EPYC 7352.
| Feature | Xeon Gold 5318H | Xeon Gold 6210U |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | Cloud Infrastructure / Virtualization | High-end Workstation / Cloud Compute |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












