Xeon Gold 5318H vs Xeon Gold 6210U

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon Gold 5318H vs Xeon Gold 6210U FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon Gold 5318H vs Xeon Gold 6210U: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon Gold 5318H

2021

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (1,063 vs 1,234).
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (18,000 vs 19,000).

Xeon Gold 6210U

2019

Why buy it

✅+16.1% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon Gold 6210U better than Xeon Gold 5318H?

Yes. Xeon Gold 6210U is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 5.6% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon Gold 6210U is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.5% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Gold 6210U is the stronger fit. You are getting 5.6% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 20 cores and 40 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon Gold 6210U still makes the most sense overall. Xeon Gold 6210U comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon Gold 5318H makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2019). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Xeon Gold 5318H vs Xeon Gold 6210U Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon Gold 5318H

The Xeon Gold 5318H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Cooper Lake-SP (2021) architecture. It features 18 cores and 36 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 24.75 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 RDIMM. Passmark benchmark score: 29,301 points. Launch price was $800.

Xeon Gold 6210U

The Xeon Gold 6210U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 20 cores and 40 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 27.5 MB. L2 cache: 20 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 28,861 points. Launch price was $1,500.

⚡

Processing Power

The Xeon Gold 5318H packs 18 cores / 36 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6210U offers 20 cores / 40 threads — the Xeon Gold 6210U has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the Xeon Gold 5318H versus 3.9 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6210U — a 2.6% clock advantage for the Xeon Gold 6210U (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Xeon Gold 5318H uses the Cooper Lake-SP (2021) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6210U uses Cascade Lake (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon Gold 5318H scores 29,301 against the Xeon Gold 6210U's 28,861 — a 1.5% lead for the Xeon Gold 5318H. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 18,000 vs 19,000 (5.4% advantage for the Xeon Gold 6210U). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,063 vs 1,234, a 14.9% lead for the Xeon Gold 6210U that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 15,000 vs 10,072 (39.3% advantage for the Xeon Gold 5318H). L3 cache: 24.75 MB (total) on the Xeon Gold 5318H vs 27.5 MB on the Xeon Gold 6210U.

Feature	Xeon Gold 5318H	Xeon Gold 6210U
Cores / Threads	18 / 36	20 / 40+11%
Boost Clock	3.8 GHz	3.9 GHz+3%
Base Clock	2.5 GHz	2.5 GHz
L3 Cache	24.75 MB (total)	27.5 MB+11%
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	20 MB+1900%
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Cooper Lake-SP (2021)	Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
PassMark	29,301+2%	28,861
Cinebench R23 Multi	18,000	19,000+6%
Geekbench 6 Single	1,063	1,234+16%
Geekbench 6 Multi	15,000+49%	10,072

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon Gold 5318H uses the LGA4189 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 6210U uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2667 on the Xeon Gold 5318H versus DDR4-2933 on the Xeon Gold 6210U — the Xeon Gold 6210U supports 10% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Gold 5318H supports up to 1152 GB of RAM compared to 1024 GB — 12.5% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 6-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 48 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: C620 Series (Xeon Gold 5318H) and C620 (Xeon Gold 6210U).

Feature	Xeon Gold 5318H	Xeon Gold 6210U
Socket	LGA4189	LGA3647
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0+33%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2667	DDR4-2933+10%
Max RAM Capacity	1152 GB+13%	1024 GB
RAM Channels	6	6
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	48	48

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support VT-x, VT-d, EPT virtualization. Primary use case: Xeon Gold 5318H targets Cloud Infrastructure / Virtualization, Xeon Gold 6210U targets High-end Workstation / Cloud Compute. Direct competitor: Xeon Gold 5318H rivals EPYC 7352; Xeon Gold 6210U rivals EPYC 7352.

Feature	Xeon Gold 5318H	Xeon Gold 6210U
Integrated GPU	No	No
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, EPT	VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use	Cloud Infrastructure / Virtualization	High-end Workstation / Cloud Compute