
Xeon Gold 5320T

Xeon W-3265
Xeon Gold 5320T vs Xeon W-3265 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Xeon Gold 5320T vs Xeon W-3265 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Xeon Gold 5320T vs Xeon W-3265: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Xeon Gold 5320T
2021Why buy it
- ✅+0.5% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $1,707 less on MSRP ($1,977 MSRP vs $3,684 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 87.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 15.3 vs 8.2 PassMark/$ ($1,977 MSRP vs $3,684 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 205W, a 55W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon W-3265 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Xeon W-3265
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +22.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (30,105 vs 30,259).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 8.2 vs 15.3 PassMark/$ ($3,684 MSRP vs $1,977 MSRP).
- ❌36.7% higher power demand at 205W vs 150W.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon Gold 5320T better than Xeon W-3265?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Xeon Gold 5320T vs Xeon W-3265 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon Gold 5320T
The Xeon Gold 5320T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture. It features 20 cores and 40 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 30,259 points. Launch price was $800.

Xeon W-3265
The Xeon W-3265 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 June 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 33 MB. L2 cache: 24 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 30,105 points. Launch price was $3,349.
Processing Power
The Xeon Gold 5320T packs 20 cores / 40 threads, while the Xeon W-3265 offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the Xeon W-3265 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the Xeon Gold 5320T versus 4.6 GHz on the Xeon W-3265 — a 27.2% clock advantage for the Xeon W-3265 (base: 2.3 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The Xeon Gold 5320T uses the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture (10 nm), while the Xeon W-3265 uses Cascade Lake (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon Gold 5320T scores 30,259 against the Xeon W-3265's 30,105 — a 0.5% lead for the Xeon Gold 5320T. L3 cache: 30 MB (total) on the Xeon Gold 5320T vs 33 MB on the Xeon W-3265.
| Feature | Xeon Gold 5320T | Xeon W-3265 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 20 / 40 | 24 / 48+20% |
| Boost Clock | 3.5 GHz | 4.6 GHz+31% |
| Base Clock | 2.3 GHz | 2.7 GHz+17% |
| L3 Cache | 30 MB (total) | 33 MB+10% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 24 MB+2300% |
| Process | 10 nm-29% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Ice Lake-SP (2021) | Cascade Lake (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 30,259 | 30,105 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 22,000 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,290 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 19,074 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon Gold 5320T uses the LGA4189 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon W-3265 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-2933 memory speed. The Xeon Gold 5320T supports up to 6144 GB of RAM compared to 1024 GB — 500% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (Xeon Gold 5320T) vs 6 (Xeon W-3265). Both provide 64 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: C621A (Xeon Gold 5320T) and C621,C620 (Xeon W-3265).
| Feature | Xeon Gold 5320T | Xeon W-3265 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA4189 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2933 | 2933 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 6144 GB+500% | 1024 GB |
| RAM Channels | 8+33% | 6 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 64 | 64 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon Gold 5320T) vs true (Xeon W-3265). Primary use case: Xeon Gold 5320T targets High-density Cloud / Virtualization. Direct competitor: Xeon Gold 5320T rivals EPYC 7413.
| Feature | Xeon Gold 5320T | Xeon W-3265 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | true |
| Target Use | High-density Cloud / Virtualization | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Xeon Gold 5320T was priced at $1977, while the Xeon W-3265 came in at $3684. On launch pricing ($1977 vs $3684), Xeon Gold 5320T was $1707 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon Gold 5320T delivers 15.3 pts/$ vs 8.2 pts/$ for the Xeon W-3265 — making the Xeon Gold 5320T the 60.8% better value option.
| Feature | Xeon Gold 5320T | Xeon W-3265 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1977-46% | $3684 |
| Performance per Dollar | 15.3+87% | 8.2 |
| Release Date | 2021 | 2019 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















