
Xeon Gold 5320T

Xeon Gold 6246R
Xeon Gold 5320T vs Xeon Gold 6246R Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Xeon Gold 5320T vs Xeon Gold 6246R FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Xeon Gold 5320T vs Xeon Gold 6246R: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Xeon Gold 5320T
2021Why buy it
- ✅+37.5% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 205W, a 55W reduction.
- ✅33.3% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 48) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Gold 6246R across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $1,977 MSRP, while Xeon Gold 6246R mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Xeon Gold 6246R
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +17.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (16,000 vs 22,000).
- ❌36.7% higher power demand at 205W vs 150W.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon Gold 5320T better than Xeon Gold 6246R?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Xeon Gold 5320T vs Xeon Gold 6246R Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon Gold 5320T
The Xeon Gold 5320T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture. It features 20 cores and 40 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 30,259 points. Launch price was $800.

Xeon Gold 6246R
The Xeon Gold 6246R is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 35.75 MB. L2 cache: 16 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 30,468 points. Launch price was $3,286.
Processing Power
The Xeon Gold 5320T packs 20 cores / 40 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6246R offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Xeon Gold 5320T has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the Xeon Gold 5320T versus 4.1 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6246R — a 15.8% clock advantage for the Xeon Gold 6246R (base: 2.3 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The Xeon Gold 5320T uses the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture (10 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6246R uses Cascade Lake (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon Gold 5320T scores 30,259 against the Xeon Gold 6246R's 30,468 — a 0.7% lead for the Xeon Gold 6246R. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 22,000 vs 16,000 (31.6% advantage for the Xeon Gold 5320T). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,290 vs 1,293, a 0.2% lead for the Xeon Gold 6246R that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 19,074 vs 9,848 (63.8% advantage for the Xeon Gold 5320T). L3 cache: 30 MB (total) on the Xeon Gold 5320T vs 35.75 MB on the Xeon Gold 6246R.
| Feature | Xeon Gold 5320T | Xeon Gold 6246R |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 20 / 40+25% | 16 / 32 |
| Boost Clock | 3.5 GHz | 4.1 GHz+17% |
| Base Clock | 2.3 GHz | 3.4 GHz+48% |
| L3 Cache | 30 MB (total) | 35.75 MB+19% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 16 MB+1500% |
| Process | 10 nm-29% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Ice Lake-SP (2021) | Cascade Lake (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 30,259 | 30,468 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 22,000+38% | 16,000 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,290 | 1,293 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 19,074+94% | 9,848 |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon Gold 5320T uses the LGA4189 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 6246R uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-2933 memory speed. The Xeon Gold 5320T supports up to 6144 GB of RAM compared to 1024 GB — 500% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (Xeon Gold 5320T) vs 6 (Xeon Gold 6246R). PCIe lanes: 64 (Xeon Gold 5320T) vs 48 (Xeon Gold 6246R) — the Xeon Gold 5320T offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: C621A (Xeon Gold 5320T) and Lewisburg (Xeon Gold 6246R).
| Feature | Xeon Gold 5320T | Xeon Gold 6246R |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA4189 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2933 | DDR4-2933 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 6144 GB+500% | 1024 GB |
| RAM Channels | 8+33% | 6 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 64+33% | 48 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support VT-x, VT-d, EPT virtualization. Primary use case: Xeon Gold 5320T targets High-density Cloud / Virtualization, Xeon Gold 6246R targets High-frequency Server / Financial. Direct competitor: Xeon Gold 5320T rivals EPYC 7413; Xeon Gold 6246R rivals EPYC 7302.
| Feature | Xeon Gold 5320T | Xeon Gold 6246R |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | High-density Cloud / Virtualization | High-frequency Server / Financial |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














