Xeon Gold 5412U vs Xeon Gold 6348

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon Gold 5412U vs Xeon Gold 6348 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon Gold 5412U vs Xeon Gold 6348: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon Gold 5412U

2023

Why buy it

✅Draws 185W instead of 235W, a 50W reduction.
✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of LGA4189 and DDR4.
✅25% more PCIe lanes (80 vs 64) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (51,599 vs 51,843).

Xeon Gold 6348

2021

Why buy it

✅+0.5% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $3,583 MSRP, while Xeon Gold 5412U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌27% higher power demand at 235W vs 185W.
❌Older platform position on LGA4189 with DDR4, while Xeon Gold 5412U moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon Gold 5412U better than Xeon Gold 6348?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Xeon Gold 5412U is ahead with a 2.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Gold 6348 pulls ahead with 0.5% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Gold 6348 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 28 cores and 56 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon Gold 5412U is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon Gold 6348 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Xeon Gold 5412U comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $3,583 MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Xeon Gold 6348 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.5% better PassMark. Xeon Gold 6348 is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (14.5 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon Gold 5412U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2021) and a healthier platform with LGA4677 and DDR5 instead of LGA4189. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Xeon Gold 5412U vs Xeon Gold 6348 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon Gold 5412U

The Xeon Gold 5412U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 10 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 45 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 185 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4400. Passmark benchmark score: 51,599 points. Launch price was $1,113.

Xeon Gold 6348

The Xeon Gold 6348 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture. It features 28 cores and 56 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 42 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 235 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 51,843 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Xeon Gold 5412U packs 24 cores / 48 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6348 offers 28 cores / 56 threads — the Xeon Gold 6348 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the Xeon Gold 5412U versus 3.5 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6348 — a 10.8% clock advantage for the Xeon Gold 5412U (base: 2.1 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Xeon Gold 5412U uses the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6348 uses Ice Lake-SP (2021) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon Gold 5412U scores 51,599 against the Xeon Gold 6348's 51,843 — a 0.5% lead for the Xeon Gold 6348. L3 cache: 45 MB on the Xeon Gold 5412U vs 42 MB (total) on the Xeon Gold 6348.

Feature	Xeon Gold 5412U	Xeon Gold 6348
Cores / Threads	24 / 48	28 / 56+17%
Boost Clock	3.9 GHz+11%	3.5 GHz
Base Clock	2.1 GHz	2.6 GHz+24%
L3 Cache	45 MB+7%	42 MB (total)
L2 Cache	2 MB (per core)+100%	1 MB (per core)
Process	Intel 7 nm-30%	10 nm
Architecture	Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)	Ice Lake-SP (2021)
PassMark	51,599	51,843

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon Gold 5412U uses the LGA4677 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 6348 uses LGA4189 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 5200 on the Xeon Gold 5412U versus 3200 on the Xeon Gold 6348 — the Xeon Gold 5412U supports 62.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 4096 of RAM. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 80 (Xeon Gold 5412U) vs 64 (Xeon Gold 6348) — the Xeon Gold 5412U offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: C741 (Xeon Gold 5412U) and C621A (Xeon Gold 6348).

Feature	Xeon Gold 5412U	Xeon Gold 6348
Socket	LGA4677	LGA4189
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	5200+63%	3200
Max RAM Capacity	4096	4096
RAM Channels	8	8
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	80+25%	64

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Direct competitor: Xeon Gold 5412U rivals EPYC 9384X; Xeon Gold 6348 rivals EPYC 7543.