Xeon Gold 6137 vs Xeon W-1290E

Intel

Xeon Gold 6137

8 Cores16 Thrd205 WWMax: 4.1 GHz2017
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Xeon W-1290E

10 Cores20 Thrd95 WWMax: 4.8 GHz2020
Similar parts
·······

Xeon Gold 6137 vs Xeon W-1290E Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon Gold 6137 vs Xeon W-1290E FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon Gold 6137 vs Xeon W-1290E: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon Gold 6137

2017

Why buy it

  • +1.6% higher PassMark.
  • +25% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 20 MB).

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon W-1290E across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • 115.8% higher power demand at 205W vs 95W.

Xeon W-1290E

2020

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +10.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Draws 95W instead of 205W, a 110W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (19,060 vs 19,365).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (20 MB vs 25 MB).

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon W-1290E better than Xeon Gold 6137?
It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Xeon W-1290E is ahead with a 10.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Gold 6137 pulls ahead with 1.6% better PassMark. Xeon Gold 6137 also has the bigger cache pool with 25% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 20 MB).
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Gold 6137 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.6% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 25% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 20 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Xeon W-1290E still makes the most sense overall. Xeon W-1290E comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 10.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Xeon W-1290E makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2017). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Xeon Gold 6137 vs Xeon W-1290E Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Xeon Gold 6137

The Xeon Gold 6137 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 25 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 19,365 points. Launch price was $800.

Intel

Xeon W-1290E

The Xeon W-1290E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 13 May 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 19,060 points. Launch price was $552.

Processing Power

The Xeon Gold 6137 packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon W-1290E offers 10 cores / 20 threads — the Xeon W-1290E has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.1 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6137 versus 4.8 GHz on the Xeon W-1290E — a 15.7% clock advantage for the Xeon W-1290E (base: 3.9 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Xeon W-1290E is built on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. In PassMark, the Xeon Gold 6137 scores 19,365 against the Xeon W-1290E's 19,060 — a 1.6% lead for the Xeon Gold 6137. L3 cache: 25 MB on the Xeon Gold 6137 vs 20 MB (total) on the Xeon W-1290E.

FeatureXeon Gold 6137Xeon W-1290E
Cores / Threads
8 / 16
10 / 20+25%
Boost Clock
4.1 GHz
4.8 GHz+17%
Base Clock
3.9 GHz+11%
3.5 GHz
L3 Cache
25 MB+25%
20 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
Process
14 nm
14 nm
Architecture
Comet Lake (2020−2025)
PassMark
19,365+2%
19,060
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon Gold 6137 uses the LGA3647 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon W-1290E uses LGA1200 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureXeon Gold 6137Xeon W-1290E
Socket
LGA3647
LGA1200
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0