Xeon E5-2690 v4 vs Xeon Gold 6137

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon E5-2690 v4 vs Xeon Gold 6137 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon E5-2690 v4 vs Xeon Gold 6137: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon E5-2690 v4

2016

Why buy it

✅+40% larger total L3 cache (35 MB vs 25 MB).
✅Draws 135W instead of 205W, a 70W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (19,255 vs 19,365).
❌Launch MSRP is still $2,090 MSRP, while Xeon Gold 6137 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon Gold 6137

2017

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (25 MB vs 35 MB).
❌51.9% higher power demand at 205W vs 135W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon Gold 6137 better than Xeon E5-2690 v4?

Yes. Xeon Gold 6137 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 2.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.6% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon Gold 6137 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 2.4% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Gold 6137 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon Gold 6137 is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon E5-2690 v4 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Xeon Gold 6137 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $2,090 MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Xeon E5-2690 v4 is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (9.2 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon Gold 6137 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2016) and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 14/28. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Xeon E5-2690 v4 vs Xeon Gold 6137 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon E5-2690 v4

The Xeon E5-2690 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 14 cores and 28 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 35 MB. L2 cache: 3.5 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 135 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 19,255 points. Launch price was $2,090.

Xeon Gold 6137

The Xeon Gold 6137 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 25 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 19,365 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Xeon E5-2690 v4 packs 14 cores / 28 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6137 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon E5-2690 v4 has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the Xeon E5-2690 v4 versus 4.1 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6137 — a 15.8% clock advantage for the Xeon Gold 6137 (base: 2.6 GHz vs 3.9 GHz). The Xeon E5-2690 v4 is built on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. In PassMark, the Xeon E5-2690 v4 scores 19,255 against the Xeon Gold 6137's 19,365 — a 0.6% lead for the Xeon Gold 6137. L3 cache: 35 MB on the Xeon E5-2690 v4 vs 25 MB on the Xeon Gold 6137.

Feature	Xeon E5-2690 v4	Xeon Gold 6137
Cores / Threads	14 / 28+75%	8 / 16
Boost Clock	3.5 GHz	4.1 GHz+17%
Base Clock	2.6 GHz	3.9 GHz+50%
L3 Cache	35 MB+40%	25 MB
L2 Cache	3.5 MB	—
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Broadwell (2015−2019)	—
PassMark	19,255	19,365

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon E5-2690 v4 uses the LGA2011 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 6137 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Xeon E5-2690 v4	Xeon Gold 6137
Socket	LGA2011	LGA3647
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0+33%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2400	—
Max RAM Capacity	1536 GB	—
RAM Channels	4	—
ECC Support	Yes	—
PCIe Lanes	40	—