Core i9-10900E vs Xeon E5-2690 v4
Core i9-10900E
Xeon E5-2690 v4
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core i9-10900E
Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5-2690 v4
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core i9-10900E | Xeon E5-2690 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($450) | ✅ More affordable ($389) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Comet Lake (2020−2025) / 14 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Broadwell (2015−2019) / 14 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core i9-10900E | Xeon E5-2690 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+15%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($450) | ✅ More affordable ($389) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i9-10900E and Xeon E5-2690 v4
Core i9-10900E
The Core i9-10900E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 19,332 points. Launch price was $488.
Xeon E5-2690 v4
The Xeon E5-2690 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 14 cores and 28 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 35 MB. L2 cache: 3.5 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 135 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 19,255 points. Launch price was $2,090.
Processing Power
The Core i9-10900E packs 10 cores / 20 threads, while the Xeon E5-2690 v4 offers 14 cores / 28 threads — the Xeon E5-2690 v4 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.7 GHz on the Core i9-10900E versus 3.5 GHz on the Xeon E5-2690 v4 — a 29.3% clock advantage for the Core i9-10900E (base: 2.8 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Core i9-10900E uses the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E5-2690 v4 uses Broadwell (2015−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-10900E scores 19,332 against the Xeon E5-2690 v4's 19,255 — a 0.4% lead for the Core i9-10900E. L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i9-10900E vs 35 MB on the Xeon E5-2690 v4.
| Feature | Core i9-10900E | Xeon E5-2690 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 10 / 20 | 14 / 28+40% |
| Boost Clock | 4.7 GHz+34% | 3.5 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.8 GHz+8% | 2.6 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 20 MB (total) | 35 MB+75% |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 3.5 MB+1300% |
| Process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Comet Lake (2020−2025) | Broadwell (2015−2019) |
| PassMark | 19,332 | 19,255 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i9-10900E uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E5-2690 v4 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-2933 memory speed. The Xeon E5-2690 v4 supports up to 1536 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 169.2% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i9-10900E) vs 4 (Xeon E5-2690 v4). PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i9-10900E) vs 40 (Xeon E5-2690 v4) — the Xeon E5-2690 v4 offers 24 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: LGA1200 (Core i9-10900E) and Intel X99,Intel C612 (Xeon E5-2690 v4).
| Feature | Core i9-10900E | Xeon E5-2690 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1200 | LGA2011 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2933 | DDR4-2400 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 1536 GB+1100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 4+100% |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 40+150% |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i9-10900E) / not specified (Xeon E5-2690 v4). The Core i9-10900E includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 630), while the Xeon E5-2690 v4 requires a dedicated GPU.
| Feature | Core i9-10900E | Xeon E5-2690 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 630 | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
Value Analysis
The Core i9-10900E launched at $488 MSRP, while the Xeon E5-2690 v4 debuted at $2090. At current prices ($450 vs $389), the Xeon E5-2690 v4 is $61 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i9-10900E delivers 43.0 pts/$ vs 49.5 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-2690 v4 — making the Xeon E5-2690 v4 the 14.1% better value option.
| Feature | Core i9-10900E | Xeon E5-2690 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $488-77% | $2090 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $450 | $389-14% |
| Performance per Dollar | 43.0 | 49.5+15% |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2016 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core i9-10900E and Xeon E5-2690 v4
