Core i9-10900E vs Ryzen 7 5800HS

Core i9-10900E vs Ryzen 7 5800HS Performance Spectrum

Core i9-10900E

10 / 20

19,332

0.0%

Core i5-11300H

Core i7-3970X Extreme Edition

19,512

+0.9%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i9-10900E vs Ryzen 7 5800HS FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i9-10900E vs Ryzen 7 5800HS: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i9-10900E

2020

Why buy it

✅+25% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 16 MB).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 630, while Ryzen 7 5800HS needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 5800HS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (19,332 vs 19,512).
❌Launch MSRP is still $488 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 5800HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.

Ryzen 7 5800HS

2021

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +12.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 20 MB).
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i9-10900E can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 7 5800HS better than Core i9-10900E?

Yes. Ryzen 7 5800HS is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 12.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.9% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 7 5800HS is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 12.6% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 7 5800HS is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.9% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 7 5800HS is still the faster CPU overall, but Core i9-10900E is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Ryzen 7 5800HS comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $488 MSRP, and it still gives you a 12.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i9-10900E is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (39.6 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 7 5800HS makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2020) and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 10/20. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i9-10900E vs Ryzen 7 5800HS Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i9-10900E

The Core i9-10900E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 19,332 points. Launch price was $488.

Ryzen 7 5800HS

The Ryzen 7 5800HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 12 January 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Cezanne-HS (Zen 3) (2021) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 19,512 points. Launch price was $299.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i9-10900E packs 10 cores / 20 threads, while the Ryzen 7 5800HS offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i9-10900E has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.7 GHz on the Core i9-10900E versus 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 5800HS — a 6.6% clock advantage for the Core i9-10900E (base: 2.8 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Core i9-10900E uses the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 7 5800HS uses Cezanne-HS (Zen 3) (2021) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-10900E scores 19,332 against the Ryzen 7 5800HS's 19,512 — a 0.9% lead for the Ryzen 7 5800HS. L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i9-10900E vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 5800HS.

Feature	Core i9-10900E	Ryzen 7 5800HS
Cores / Threads	10 / 20+25%	8 / 16
Boost Clock	4.7 GHz+7%	4.4 GHz
Base Clock	2.8 GHz	2.8 GHz
L3 Cache	20 MB (total)+25%	16 MB (total)
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	512K (per core)+100%
Process	14 nm	7 nm-50%
Architecture	Comet Lake (2020−2025)	Cezanne-HS (Zen 3) (2021)
PassMark	19,332	19,512

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i9-10900E uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 7 5800HS uses FP6 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i9-10900E	Ryzen 7 5800HS
Socket	LGA1200	FP6
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0+33%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2933	—
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i9-10900E) / not specified (Ryzen 7 5800HS). The Core i9-10900E includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 630), while the Ryzen 7 5800HS requires a dedicated GPU.