Core i9-10900E vs Xeon W-2245

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i9-10900E vs Xeon W-2245 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i9-10900E vs Xeon W-2245: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i9-10900E

2020

Why buy it

✅+21.2% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 17 MB).
✅Draws 65W instead of 155W, a 90W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 630, while Xeon W-2245 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon W-2245 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (19,332 vs 19,422).
❌Launch MSRP is still $488 MSRP, while Xeon W-2245 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon W-2245

2019

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +10.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (17 MB vs 20 MB).
❌138.5% higher power demand at 155W vs 65W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i9-10900E can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon W-2245 better than Core i9-10900E?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon W-2245 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i9-10900E is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon W-2245 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 10.5% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon W-2245 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon W-2245 is still the faster CPU overall, but Core i9-10900E is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Xeon W-2245 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $488 MSRP, and it still gives you a 10.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i9-10900E is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (39.6 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i9-10900E makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2019) and 21.2% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 17 MB). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i9-10900E vs Xeon W-2245 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i9-10900E

The Core i9-10900E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 19,332 points. Launch price was $488.

Xeon W-2245

The Xeon W-2245 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 16.5 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2066. Thermal design power (TDP): 155 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 19,422 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i9-10900E packs 10 cores / 20 threads, while the Xeon W-2245 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i9-10900E has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.7 GHz on the Core i9-10900E versus 4.7 GHz on the Xeon W-2245 — identical boost frequencies (base: 2.8 GHz vs 3.9 GHz). The Core i9-10900E is built on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. In PassMark, the Core i9-10900E scores 19,332 against the Xeon W-2245's 19,422 — a 0.5% lead for the Xeon W-2245. L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i9-10900E vs 16.5 MB on the Xeon W-2245.

Feature	Core i9-10900E	Xeon W-2245
Cores / Threads	10 / 20+25%	8 / 16
Boost Clock	4.7 GHz	4.7 GHz
Base Clock	2.8 GHz	3.9 GHz+39%
L3 Cache	20 MB (total)+21%	16.5 MB
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	—
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Comet Lake (2020−2025)	—
PassMark	19,332	19,422

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i9-10900E uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon W-2245 uses LGA2066 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i9-10900E	Xeon W-2245
Socket	LGA1200	LGA2066
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2933	—
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i9-10900E) / not specified (Xeon W-2245). The Core i9-10900E includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 630), while the Xeon W-2245 requires a dedicated GPU.