Core i9-10900E vs Xeon E-2386G

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i9-10900E vs Xeon E-2386G FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i9-10900E vs Xeon E-2386G: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i9-10900E

2020

Why buy it

✅+66.7% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 12 MB).
✅Draws 65W instead of 95W, a 30W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 630, while Xeon E-2386G needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E-2386G across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (19,332 vs 19,468).
❌Launch MSRP is still $488 MSRP, while Xeon E-2386G mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon E-2386G

2021

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +12.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 20 MB).
❌46.2% higher power demand at 95W vs 65W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i9-10900E can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E-2386G better than Core i9-10900E?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E-2386G makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i9-10900E is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon E-2386G is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 12.5% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E-2386G is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E-2386G is still the faster CPU overall, but Core i9-10900E is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Xeon E-2386G comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $488 MSRP, and it still gives you a 12.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i9-10900E is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (39.6 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon E-2386G makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2020) and more multi-core headroom with 6 cores / 12 threads instead of 10/20. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i9-10900E vs Xeon E-2386G Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i9-10900E

The Core i9-10900E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 19,332 points. Launch price was $488.

Xeon E-2386G

The Xeon E-2386G is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Rocket Lake-E (2021) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 19,468 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i9-10900E packs 10 cores / 20 threads, while the Xeon E-2386G offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i9-10900E has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.7 GHz on the Core i9-10900E versus 5.1 GHz on the Xeon E-2386G — a 8.2% clock advantage for the Xeon E-2386G (base: 2.8 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Core i9-10900E uses the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E-2386G uses Rocket Lake-E (2021) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-10900E scores 19,332 against the Xeon E-2386G's 19,468 — a 0.7% lead for the Xeon E-2386G. L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i9-10900E vs 12 MB (total) on the Xeon E-2386G.

Feature	Core i9-10900E	Xeon E-2386G
Cores / Threads	10 / 20+67%	6 / 12
Boost Clock	4.7 GHz	5.1 GHz+9%
Base Clock	2.8 GHz	3.5 GHz+25%
L3 Cache	20 MB (total)+67%	12 MB (total)
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	512K (per core)+100%
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Comet Lake (2020−2025)	Rocket Lake-E (2021)
PassMark	19,332	19,468

🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the LGA1200 socket with PCIe 4.0.

Feature	Core i9-10900E	Xeon E-2386G
Socket	LGA1200	LGA1200
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0+33%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2933	—
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i9-10900E) / not specified (Xeon E-2386G). The Core i9-10900E includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 630), while the Xeon E-2386G requires a dedicated GPU.