EPYC 7252 vs Xeon Gold 6137

EPYC 7252 vs Xeon Gold 6137 Performance Spectrum

EPYC 7252

8 / 16

19,411

+0.2%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Xeon Gold 6137

8 / 16

19,365

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 7252 vs Xeon Gold 6137 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 7252 vs Xeon Gold 6137: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 7252

2019

Why buy it

✅+0.2% higher PassMark.
✅+28% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 25 MB).
✅Draws 120W instead of 205W, a 85W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Gold 6137 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Xeon Gold 6137

2017

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +10.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (19,365 vs 19,411).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (25 MB vs 32 MB).
❌70.8% higher power demand at 205W vs 120W.

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 7252 better than Xeon Gold 6137?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Xeon Gold 6137 is ahead with a 10.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7252 pulls ahead with 0.2% better PassMark. EPYC 7252 also has the bigger cache pool with 28% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 25 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7252 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 28% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 25 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 7252 still makes the most sense overall. EPYC 7252 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.2% better PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 7252 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2017), 28% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 25 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 8/16. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

EPYC 7252 vs Xeon Gold 6137 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 7252

The EPYC 7252 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 19,411 points. Launch price was $475.

Xeon Gold 6137

The Xeon Gold 6137 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 25 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 19,365 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the EPYC 7252 and Xeon Gold 6137 share an identical 8-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the EPYC 7252 versus 4.1 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6137 — a 24.7% clock advantage for the Xeon Gold 6137 (base: 3.1 GHz vs 3.9 GHz). The EPYC 7252 is built on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. In PassMark, the EPYC 7252 scores 19,411 against the Xeon Gold 6137's 19,365 — a 0.2% lead for the EPYC 7252. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the EPYC 7252 vs 25 MB on the Xeon Gold 6137.

Feature	EPYC 7252	Xeon Gold 6137
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	8 / 16
Boost Clock	3.2 GHz	4.1 GHz+28%
Base Clock	3.1 GHz	3.9 GHz+26%
L3 Cache	32 MB (total)+28%	25 MB
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)	—
Process	7 nm, 14 nm-50%	14 nm
Architecture	Zen 2 (2017−2020)	—
PassMark	19,411	19,365

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7252 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 6137 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.