EPYC 7252 vs Xeon D-2183IT

EPYC 7252 vs Xeon D-2183IT Performance Spectrum

EPYC 7252

8 / 16

19,411

+0.2%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Xeon D-2183IT

16 / 32

19,377

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 7252 vs Xeon D-2183IT FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 7252 vs Xeon D-2183IT: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 7252

2019

Why buy it

✅+45.5% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 22 MB).

Trade-offs

❌20% higher power demand at 120W vs 100W.

Xeon D-2183IT

2018

Why buy it

✅Draws 100W instead of 120W, a 20W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (19,377 vs 19,411).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (22 MB vs 32 MB).

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 7252 better than Xeon D-2183IT?

Yes. EPYC 7252 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.2% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, EPYC 7252 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.9% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7252 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 45.5% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 22 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 7252 still makes the most sense overall. EPYC 7252 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 7252 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2018), 45.5% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 22 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 16/32. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

EPYC 7252 vs Xeon D-2183IT Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 7252

The EPYC 7252 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 19,411 points. Launch price was $475.

Xeon D-2183IT

The Xeon D-2183IT is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 7 February 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 22 MB. L2 cache: 16 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2518. Thermal design power (TDP): 100 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 19,377 points. Launch price was $1,764.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 7252 packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon D-2183IT offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Xeon D-2183IT has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the EPYC 7252 versus 3 GHz on the Xeon D-2183IT — a 6.5% clock advantage for the EPYC 7252 (base: 3.1 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The EPYC 7252 uses the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture (7 nm, 14 nm), while the Xeon D-2183IT uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7252 scores 19,411 against the Xeon D-2183IT's 19,377 — a 0.2% lead for the EPYC 7252. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the EPYC 7252 vs 22 MB on the Xeon D-2183IT.

Feature	EPYC 7252	Xeon D-2183IT
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	16 / 32+100%
Boost Clock	3.2 GHz+7%	3 GHz
Base Clock	3.1 GHz+41%	2.2 GHz
L3 Cache	32 MB (total)+45%	22 MB
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)	16 MB+3100%
Process	7 nm, 14 nm-50%	14 nm
Architecture	Zen 2 (2017−2020)	Skylake (server) (2017−2018)
PassMark	19,411	19,377

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7252 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon D-2183IT uses FCBGA2518 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.