EPYC 7252 vs Xeon W-1350P

EPYC 7252 vs Xeon W-1350P Performance Spectrum

EPYC 7252

8 / 16

19,411

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Xeon W-1350P

6 / 12

19,611

+1.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 7252 vs Xeon W-1350P FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 7252 vs Xeon W-1350P: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 7252

2019

Why buy it

✅+166.7% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 12 MB).
✅Draws 120W instead of 125W, a 5W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon W-1350P across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (19,411 vs 19,611).

Xeon W-1350P

2021

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 32 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $311 MSRP, while EPYC 7252 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon W-1350P better than EPYC 7252?

Yes. Xeon W-1350P is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 3.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 1% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon W-1350P is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 3.3% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon W-1350P is the stronger fit. You are getting 1% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon W-1350P is the better buy right now. Xeon W-1350P comes in at an unclear MSRP at $311 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 3.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (63.1 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon W-1350P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2019) and more multi-core headroom with 6 cores / 12 threads instead of 8/16. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

EPYC 7252 vs Xeon W-1350P Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 7252

The EPYC 7252 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 19,411 points. Launch price was $475.

Xeon W-1350P

The Xeon W-1350P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 6 May 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Rocket Lake-S (2021) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 19,611 points. Launch price was $311.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 7252 packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon W-1350P offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the EPYC 7252 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the EPYC 7252 versus 5.1 GHz on the Xeon W-1350P — a 45.8% clock advantage for the Xeon W-1350P (base: 3.1 GHz vs 4 GHz). The EPYC 7252 uses the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture (7 nm, 14 nm), while the Xeon W-1350P uses Rocket Lake-S (2021) (14 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7252 scores 19,411 against the Xeon W-1350P's 19,611 — a 1% lead for the Xeon W-1350P. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the EPYC 7252 vs 12 MB (total) on the Xeon W-1350P.

Feature	EPYC 7252	Xeon W-1350P
Cores / Threads	8 / 16+33%	6 / 12
Boost Clock	3.2 GHz	5.1 GHz+59%
Base Clock	3.1 GHz	4 GHz+29%
L3 Cache	32 MB (total)+167%	12 MB (total)
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)	512 kB (per core)
Process	7 nm, 14 nm-50%	14 nm
Architecture	Zen 2 (2017−2020)	Rocket Lake-S (2021)
PassMark	19,411	19,611+1%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7252 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon W-1350P uses LGA1200 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.