Xeon Gold 6142 vs Xeon W-3235

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon Gold 6142 vs Xeon W-3235 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon Gold 6142 vs Xeon W-3235: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon Gold 6142

2017

Why buy it

✅Draws 150W instead of 180W, a 30W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon W-3235 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (25,490 vs 25,552).

Xeon W-3235

2019

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +19.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $1,538 MSRP, while Xeon Gold 6142 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌20% higher power demand at 180W vs 150W.
❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon W-3235 better than Xeon Gold 6142?

Yes. Xeon W-3235 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 19.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.2% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon W-3235 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 19.9% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon W-3235 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 12 cores and 24 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon W-3235 is the better buy right now. Xeon W-3235 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $1,538 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 19.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (16.6 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon W-3235 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2017) and more multi-core headroom with 12 cores / 24 threads instead of 16/32. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Xeon Gold 6142 vs Xeon W-3235 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon Gold 6142

The Xeon Gold 6142 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 25 April 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 22 MB. L2 cache: 16 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 25,490 points. Launch price was $2,946.

Xeon W-3235

The Xeon W-3235 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 June 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 19.25 MB. L2 cache: 12 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 180 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 25,552 points. Launch price was $1,398.

⚡

Processing Power

The Xeon Gold 6142 packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Xeon W-3235 offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Xeon Gold 6142 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6142 versus 4.5 GHz on the Xeon W-3235 — a 19.5% clock advantage for the Xeon W-3235 (base: 2.6 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Xeon Gold 6142 uses the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon W-3235 uses Cascade Lake (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon Gold 6142 scores 25,490 against the Xeon W-3235's 25,552 — a 0.2% lead for the Xeon W-3235. L3 cache: 22 MB on the Xeon Gold 6142 vs 19.25 MB on the Xeon W-3235.

Feature	Xeon Gold 6142	Xeon W-3235
Cores / Threads	16 / 32+33%	12 / 24
Boost Clock	3.7 GHz	4.5 GHz+22%
Base Clock	2.6 GHz	3.3 GHz+27%
L3 Cache	22 MB+14%	19.25 MB
L2 Cache	16 MB+33%	12 MB
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Skylake (server) (2017−2018)	Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
PassMark	25,490	25,552