Xeon Gold 6148
VS
EPYC 7303

Xeon Gold 6148 vs EPYC 7303

Intel

Xeon Gold 6148

20 Cores40 Thrd150 WWMax: 3.7 GHz2017
VS
AMD

EPYC 7303

16 Cores32 Thrd130 WWMax: 3.4 GHz2023

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon Gold 6148

#482
Xeon 6724P
MSRP: $3622|Avg: $3622
111%
#483
EPYC 9634
MSRP: $10304|Avg: $3949
111%
#484
EPYC 7773X
MSRP: $8800|Avg: $8800
110%
#485
Xeon Gold 6258R
MSRP: $3950|Avg: $1400
108%
#486
EPYC 9175F
MSRP: $4256|Avg: $3703
108%
#488
EPYC 9534
MSRP: $8803|Avg: $2999
107%
#489
EPYC 9654
MSRP: $11805|Avg: $5345
107%
#490
EPYC 7H12
MSRP: $6950|Avg: $1340
106%
#491
EPYC 7742
MSRP: $6950|Avg: $800
106%
#492
Xeon Platinum 8352M
MSRP: $4471|Avg: $4471
105%
#493
Xeon Platinum 8570
MSRP: $9595|Avg: $9595
103%
#494
EPYC 9184X
MSRP: $4928|Avg: $3750
102%
#495
Xeon Platinum 8470
MSRP: $9359|Avg: $9359
102%
#496
Xeon E7-8857 v2
MSRP: $3838|Avg: $2995
100%
#497
Xeon Gold 6148
MSRP: $3072|Avg: $290
100%
#498
Xeon E5-1681 V3
MSRP: $1589|Avg: $200
99%
#499
Xeon W-3275
MSRP: $4449|Avg: $1550
98%
#500
Xeon Gold 6138
MSRP: $2612|Avg: $300
98%
#501
Xeon E5-2690 v4
MSRP: $2090|Avg: $389
97%
#502
Xeon Platinum 8362
MSRP: $6236|Avg: $5740
96%
#503
Xeon W-3275M
MSRP: $4449|Avg: $4449
96%
#504
Xeon E5-2660 v3
MSRP: $1445|Avg: $150
95%
#505
Xeon E5-2679 v4
MSRP: $2702|Avg: $500
94%
#506
Xeon E5-2680 v3
MSRP: $1745|Avg: $212
90%
#507
Xeon Platinum 8562Y+
MSRP: $5945|Avg: $7000
89%
#508
Xeon E7-8895 v2
MSRP: $6841|Avg: $65
88%
#509
EPYC 9754
MSRP: $11900|Avg: $10631
88%
#509
EPYC 9684X
MSRP: $14756|Avg: $14756
88%
#511
Xeon D-1587
MSRP: $1652|Avg: $1443
87%
#512
Xeon E5-2687W v4
MSRP: $2141|Avg: $1138
87%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar EPYC 7303

#59
Ryzen 9 PRO 7945
MSRP: $409|Avg: $450
136%
#60
Xeon Platinum 8571N
MSRP: $599|Avg: $418
136%
#61
Xeon Platinum 8270
MSRP: $7405|Avg: N/A
136%
#62
EPYC 4464P
MSRP: $429|Avg: $450
131%
#63
EPYC 4345P
MSRP: $329|Avg: $329
130%
#64
EPYC 4344P
MSRP: $329|Avg: $314
128%
#65
EPYC 4364P
MSRP: $399|Avg: $334
122%
#66
EPYC 4585PX
MSRP: $699|Avg: $826
120%
#67
EPYC 4545P
MSRP: $549|Avg: $595
118%
#71
Ryzen 7 PRO 7745
MSRP: $400|Avg: $343
104%
#73
EPYC 4484PX
MSRP: $599|Avg: $599
100%
#74
EPYC 7303
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#86
Xeon Platinum 8260
MSRP: $400|Avg: $400
91%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The EPYC 7303 (2023) utilizes 7 nm technology and DDR4, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightXeon Gold 6148EPYC 7303
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($290)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Skylake (server) (2017−2018) / 14 nm)
✨ Modern (Milan (2021−2023) / 7 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Xeon Gold 6148 (2017) relies on 14 nm technology and DDR4-2666, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightXeon Gold 6148EPYC 7303
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($290)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon Gold 6148 and EPYC 7303

Intel

Xeon Gold 6148

The Xeon Gold 6148 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 25 April 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 20 cores and 40 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 27.5 MB. L2 cache: 20 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 29,021 points. Launch price was $3,072.

AMD

EPYC 7303

The EPYC 7303 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 September 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 28,572 points. Launch price was $604.

Processing Power

The Xeon Gold 6148 packs 20 cores / 40 threads, while the EPYC 7303 offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Xeon Gold 6148 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6148 versus 3.4 GHz on the EPYC 7303 — a 8.5% clock advantage for the Xeon Gold 6148 (base: 2.4 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Xeon Gold 6148 uses the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture (14 nm), while the EPYC 7303 uses Milan (2021−2023) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon Gold 6148 scores 29,021 against the EPYC 7303's 28,572 — a 1.6% lead for the Xeon Gold 6148. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 18,500 vs 18,000 (2.7% advantage for the Xeon Gold 6148). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,254 vs 1,960, a 43.9% lead for the EPYC 7303 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 9,445 vs 11,000 (15.2% advantage for the EPYC 7303). L3 cache: 27.5 MB on the Xeon Gold 6148 vs 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 7303.

FeatureXeon Gold 6148EPYC 7303
Cores / Threads
20 / 40+25%
16 / 32
Boost Clock
3.7 GHz+9%
3.4 GHz
Base Clock
2.4 GHz
2.4 GHz
L3 Cache
27.5 MB
64 MB (total)+133%
L2 Cache
20 MB+3900%
512 kB (per core)
Process
14 nm
7 nm-50%
Architecture
Skylake (server) (2017−2018)
Milan (2021−2023)
PassMark
29,021+2%
28,572
Cinebench R23 Multi
18,500+3%
18,000
Geekbench 6 Single
1,254
1,960+56%
Geekbench 6 Multi
9,445
11,000+16%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon Gold 6148 uses the LGA3647 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the EPYC 7303 uses SP3 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-2666 memory speed. The Xeon Gold 6148 supports up to 768 GB of RAM compared to 204 GB 116% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 6 (Xeon Gold 6148) vs 8 (EPYC 7303). PCIe lanes: 48 (Xeon Gold 6148) vs 128 (EPYC 7303) — the EPYC 7303 offers 80 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: C620 (Xeon Gold 6148) and SP3 platform (EPYC 7303).

FeatureXeon Gold 6148EPYC 7303
Socket
LGA3647
SP3
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 4.0+33%
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2666
DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity
768 GB+276%
204 GB
RAM Channels
6
8+33%
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
48
128+167%
🔧

Advanced Features

Only the EPYC 7303 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Xeon Gold 6148 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon Gold 6148) vs AMD-V, SVM (EPYC 7303). Primary use case: Xeon Gold 6148 targets Legacy Enterprise Workloads, EPYC 7303 targets High-frequency Server Workloads. Direct competitor: Xeon Gold 6148 rivals EPYC 7401; EPYC 7303 rivals Xeon Gold 6334.

FeatureXeon Gold 6148EPYC 7303
Integrated GPU
No
No
Unlocked
No
Yes
AVX-512
Yes
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
AMD-V, SVM
Target Use
Legacy Enterprise Workloads
High-frequency Server Workloads