Xeon Gold 6148 vs Xeon Platinum 8160

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon Gold 6148 vs Xeon Platinum 8160 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon Gold 6148 vs Xeon Platinum 8160: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon Gold 6148

2017

Why buy it

✅+0.1% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (28 MB vs 33 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $3,072 MSRP, while Xeon Platinum 8160 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon Platinum 8160

2017

Why buy it

✅+20% larger total L3 cache (33 MB vs 28 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (28,989 vs 29,021).

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon Gold 6148 better than Xeon Platinum 8160?

Yes. Xeon Gold 6148 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 2.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.1% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

For gaming, this matchup is basically a tie in the data we have.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Gold 6148 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 20 cores and 40 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon Gold 6148 is the better buy right now. Xeon Gold 6148 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $3,072 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (9.4 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon Platinum 8160 is the safer long-term CPU choice because it gives you more room to grow and a better platform outlook.

Xeon Gold 6148 vs Xeon Platinum 8160 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon Gold 6148

The Xeon Gold 6148 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 25 April 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 20 cores and 40 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 27.5 MB. L2 cache: 20 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 29,021 points. Launch price was $3,072.

Xeon Platinum 8160

The Xeon Platinum 8160 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 25 April 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 33 MB. L2 cache: 24 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 28,989 points. Launch price was $4,702.

⚡

Processing Power

The Xeon Gold 6148 packs 20 cores / 40 threads, while the Xeon Platinum 8160 offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the Xeon Platinum 8160 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6148 versus 3.7 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8160 — identical boost frequencies (base: 2.4 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). Both are built on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture using a 14 nm process. In PassMark, the Xeon Gold 6148 scores 29,021 against the Xeon Platinum 8160's 28,989 — a 0.1% lead for the Xeon Gold 6148. L3 cache: 27.5 MB on the Xeon Gold 6148 vs 33 MB on the Xeon Platinum 8160.

Feature	Xeon Gold 6148	Xeon Platinum 8160
Cores / Threads	20 / 40	24 / 48+20%
Boost Clock	3.7 GHz	3.7 GHz
Base Clock	2.4 GHz+14%	2.1 GHz
L3 Cache	27.5 MB	33 MB+20%
L2 Cache	20 MB	24 MB+20%
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Skylake (server) (2017−2018)	Skylake (server) (2017−2018)
PassMark	29,021	28,989
Cinebench R23 Multi	18,500	—
Geekbench 6 Single	1,254	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	9,445	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the LGA3647 socket with PCIe 3.0. Both support up to DDR4-2666 memory speed. Both support up to 768 GB of RAM. Both feature 6-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 48 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: C620 (Xeon Gold 6148) and C621 (Xeon Platinum 8160).

Feature	Xeon Gold 6148	Xeon Platinum 8160
Socket	LGA3647	LGA3647
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2666	2666
Max RAM Capacity	768 GB	768 GB
RAM Channels	6	6
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	48	48

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon Gold 6148) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Platinum 8160). Primary use case: Xeon Gold 6148 targets Legacy Enterprise Workloads. Direct competitor: Xeon Gold 6148 rivals EPYC 7401; Xeon Platinum 8160 rivals EPYC 7451.