
Ryzen 9 7940H

Xeon Gold 6148
Ryzen 9 7940H vs Xeon Gold 6148 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Ryzen 9 7940H vs Xeon Gold 6148 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Ryzen 9 7940H vs Xeon Gold 6148: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Ryzen 9 7940H
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +41.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 150W, a 115W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP8 with DDR5 support instead of LGA3647 and DDR4.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 780M, while Xeon Gold 6148 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (17,200 vs 18,500).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 28 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 6148, which brings 20 cores / 40 threads and 48 PCIe lanes.
Xeon Gold 6148
2017Why buy it
- ✅+7.6% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
- ✅+71.9% larger total L3 cache (28 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 20 cores / 40 threads, plus 48 PCIe lanes vs 20.
- ✅140% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 7940H across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $3,072 MSRP, while Ryzen 9 7940H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌328.6% higher power demand at 150W vs 35W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA3647 with DDR4, while Ryzen 9 7940H moves to FP8 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 9 7940H can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 9 7940H better than Xeon Gold 6148?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 9 7940H vs Xeon Gold 6148 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.


Ryzen 9 7940H
The Ryzen 9 7940H is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Janeiro 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Phoenix (2023−2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5600. Passmark benchmark score: 29,151 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon Gold 6148
The Xeon Gold 6148 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 25 April 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 20 cores and 40 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 27.5 MB. L2 cache: 20 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 29,021 points. Launch price was $3,072.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 9 7940H packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6148 offers 20 cores / 40 threads — the Xeon Gold 6148 has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.2 GHz on the Ryzen 9 7940H versus 3.7 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6148 — a 33.7% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 7940H (base: 4 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Ryzen 9 7940H uses the Phoenix (2023−2024) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6148 uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 9 7940H scores 29,151 against the Xeon Gold 6148's 29,021 — a 0.4% lead for the Ryzen 9 7940H. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 17,200 vs 18,500 (7.3% advantage for the Xeon Gold 6148). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,646 vs 1,254, a 71.4% lead for the Ryzen 9 7940H that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 13,495 vs 9,445 (35.3% advantage for the Ryzen 9 7940H). L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 7940H vs 27.5 MB on the Xeon Gold 6148.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 7940H | Xeon Gold 6148 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 20 / 40+150% |
| Boost Clock | 5.2 GHz+41% | 3.7 GHz |
| Base Clock | 4 GHz+67% | 2.4 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB (total) | 27.5 MB+72% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 20 MB+1900% |
| Process | 4 nm-71% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Phoenix (2023−2024) | Skylake (server) (2017−2018) |
| PassMark | 29,151 | 29,021 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 17,200 | 18,500+8% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,646+111% | 1,254 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 13,495+43% | 9,445 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 9 7940H uses the FP8 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 6148 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5600 on the Ryzen 9 7940H versus DDR4-2666 on the Xeon Gold 6148 — the Ryzen 9 7940H supports 110.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Gold 6148 supports up to 768 GB of RAM compared to 256 GB — 200% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 9 7940H) vs 6 (Xeon Gold 6148). PCIe lanes: 20 (Ryzen 9 7940H) vs 48 (Xeon Gold 6148) — the Xeon Gold 6148 offers 28 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: FP7,FP7r2,FP8 (Ryzen 9 7940H) and C620 (Xeon Gold 6148).
| Feature | Ryzen 9 7940H | Xeon Gold 6148 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP8 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5600+110% | DDR4-2666 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 256 GB | 768 GB+200% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 6+200% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 48+140% |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 9 7940H has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: AMD-V, SVM (Ryzen 9 7940H) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon Gold 6148). The Ryzen 9 7940H includes integrated graphics (Radeon 780M), while the Xeon Gold 6148 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 9 7940H targets High-performance Gaming Laptop, Xeon Gold 6148 targets Legacy Enterprise Workloads. Direct competitor: Ryzen 9 7940H rivals Core i9-13900H; Xeon Gold 6148 rivals EPYC 7401.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 7940H | Xeon Gold 6148 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Radeon 780M | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V, SVM | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | High-performance Gaming Laptop | Legacy Enterprise Workloads |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












