Ryzen 9 7940H vs Xeon Gold 6248

Ryzen 9 7940H vs Xeon Gold 6248 Performance Spectrum

Ryzen 9 7940H

8 / 16

29,151

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX

Xeon Gold 6248

20 / 40

29,535

+1.3%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen 9 7940H vs Xeon Gold 6248 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen 9 7940H vs Xeon Gold 6248: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen 9 7940H

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +40.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 35W instead of 150W, a 115W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FP8 with DDR5 support instead of LGA3647 and DDR4.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 780M, while Xeon Gold 6248 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (17,200 vs 19,000).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 28 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 6248, which brings 20 cores / 40 threads and 48 PCIe lanes.

Xeon Gold 6248

2019

Why buy it

✅+10.5% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
✅+71.9% larger total L3 cache (28 MB vs 16 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 20 cores / 40 threads, plus 48 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅140% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 7940H across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌328.6% higher power demand at 150W vs 35W.
❌Older platform position on LGA3647 with DDR4, while Ryzen 9 7940H moves to FP8 and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 9 7940H can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 9 7940H better than Xeon Gold 6248?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon Gold 6248 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 9 7940H is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Gold 6248 is the stronger fit. You are getting 10.5% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 20 cores and 40 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 71.9% larger total L3 cache (28 MB vs 16 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 9 7940H still makes the most sense overall. Ryzen 9 7940H comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 40.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 9 7940H makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2019) and a healthier platform with FP8 and DDR5 instead of LGA3647. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Ryzen 9 7940H vs Xeon Gold 6248 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Ryzen 9 7940H

The Ryzen 9 7940H is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Janeiro 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Phoenix (2023−2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5600. Passmark benchmark score: 29,151 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon Gold 6248

The Xeon Gold 6248 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 20 cores and 40 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 27.5 MB. L2 cache: 20 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 29,535 points. Launch price was $3,072.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 9 7940H packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6248 offers 20 cores / 40 threads — the Xeon Gold 6248 has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.2 GHz on the Ryzen 9 7940H versus 3.9 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6248 — a 28.6% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 7940H (base: 4 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Ryzen 9 7940H uses the Phoenix (2023−2024) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6248 uses Cascade Lake (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 9 7940H scores 29,151 against the Xeon Gold 6248's 29,535 — a 1.3% lead for the Xeon Gold 6248. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 17,200 vs 19,000 (9.9% advantage for the Xeon Gold 6248). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,646 vs 1,327, a 66.4% lead for the Ryzen 9 7940H that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 13,495 vs 15,277 (12.4% advantage for the Xeon Gold 6248). L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 7940H vs 27.5 MB on the Xeon Gold 6248.

Feature	Ryzen 9 7940H	Xeon Gold 6248
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	20 / 40+150%
Boost Clock	5.2 GHz+33%	3.9 GHz
Base Clock	4 GHz+60%	2.5 GHz
L3 Cache	16 MB (total)	27.5 MB+72%
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	20 MB+1900%
Process	4 nm-71%	14 nm
Architecture	Phoenix (2023−2024)	Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
PassMark	29,151	29,535+1%
Cinebench R23 Multi	17,200	19,000+10%
Geekbench 6 Single	2,646+99%	1,327
Geekbench 6 Multi	13,495	15,277+13%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 9 7940H uses the FP8 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 6248 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5600 on the Ryzen 9 7940H versus DDR4-2933 on the Xeon Gold 6248 — the Ryzen 9 7940H supports 90.9% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Gold 6248 supports up to 1024 GB of RAM compared to 256 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 9 7940H) vs 6 (Xeon Gold 6248). PCIe lanes: 20 (Ryzen 9 7940H) vs 48 (Xeon Gold 6248) — the Xeon Gold 6248 offers 28 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: FP7,FP7r2,FP8 (Ryzen 9 7940H) and C620 (Xeon Gold 6248).

Feature	Ryzen 9 7940H	Xeon Gold 6248
Socket	FP8	LGA3647
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0+33%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-5600+91%	DDR4-2933
Max RAM Capacity	256 GB	1024 GB+300%
RAM Channels	2	6+200%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20	48+140%

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen 9 7940H has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: AMD-V, SVM (Ryzen 9 7940H) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon Gold 6248). The Ryzen 9 7940H includes integrated graphics (Radeon 780M), while the Xeon Gold 6248 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 9 7940H targets High-performance Gaming Laptop, Xeon Gold 6248 targets General Purpose Enterprise Server. Direct competitor: Ryzen 9 7940H rivals Core i9-13900H; Xeon Gold 6248 rivals EPYC 7352.

Feature	Ryzen 9 7940H	Xeon Gold 6248
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	Radeon 780M	—
Unlocked	Yes	No
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	AMD-V, SVM	VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use	High-performance Gaming Laptop	General Purpose Enterprise Server