Xeon Gold 6154 vs Xeon Gold 6252

Intel

Xeon Gold 6154

18 Cores36 Thrd200 WWMax: 3.7 GHz2017
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Xeon Gold 6252

24 Cores48 Thrd150 WWMax: 3.7 GHz2019
Similar parts
·······

Xeon Gold 6154 vs Xeon Gold 6252 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon Gold 6154 vs Xeon Gold 6252 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon Gold 6154 vs Xeon Gold 6252: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon Gold 6154

2017

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +5.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

  • Smaller total L3 cache (25 MB vs 36 MB).
  • 33.3% higher power demand at 200W vs 150W.

Xeon Gold 6252

2019

Why buy it

  • +44.4% larger total L3 cache (36 MB vs 25 MB).
  • Draws 150W instead of 200W, a 50W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Gold 6154 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (27,148 vs 27,457).

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon Gold 6154 better than Xeon Gold 6252?
Yes. Xeon Gold 6154 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 5.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 1.1% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Xeon Gold 6154 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 5.3% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Gold 6154 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.1% better PassMark, backed by 18 cores and 36 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Xeon Gold 6154 still makes the most sense overall. Xeon Gold 6154 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 5.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Xeon Gold 6252 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2017) and 44.4% larger total L3 cache (36 MB vs 25 MB). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Xeon Gold 6154 vs Xeon Gold 6252 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Xeon Gold 6154

The Xeon Gold 6154 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 July 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 18 cores and 36 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 24.75 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 200 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 27,457 points. Launch price was $3,543.

Intel

Xeon Gold 6252

The Xeon Gold 6252 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 35.75 MB. L2 cache: 24 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 27,148 points. Launch price was $3,655.

Processing Power

The Xeon Gold 6154 packs 18 cores / 36 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6252 offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the Xeon Gold 6252 has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6154 versus 3.7 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6252 — identical boost frequencies (base: 3 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Xeon Gold 6154 uses the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6252 uses Cascade Lake (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon Gold 6154 scores 27,457 against the Xeon Gold 6252's 27,148 — a 1.1% lead for the Xeon Gold 6154. L3 cache: 24.75 MB (total) on the Xeon Gold 6154 vs 35.75 MB on the Xeon Gold 6252.

FeatureXeon Gold 6154Xeon Gold 6252
Cores / Threads
18 / 36
24 / 48+33%
Boost Clock
3.7 GHz
3.7 GHz
Base Clock
3 GHz+43%
2.1 GHz
L3 Cache
24.75 MB (total)
35.75 MB+44%
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
24 MB+2300%
Process
14 nm
14 nm
Architecture
Skylake (server) (2017−2018)
Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
PassMark
27,457+1%
27,148
🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the LGA3647 socket with PCIe 3.0.

FeatureXeon Gold 6154Xeon Gold 6252
Socket
LGA3647
LGA3647
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0