
Core i9-10940X
Popular choices:

Xeon Gold 6154
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i9-10940X
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +11.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 165W instead of 200W, a 35W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (19 MB vs 25 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 6154, which brings 18 cores / 36 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $784 MSRP, while Xeon Gold 6154 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Xeon Gold 6154
2017Why buy it
- ✅+28.6% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 19 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 18 cores / 36 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-10940X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (27,457 vs 27,684).
- ❌21.2% higher power demand at 200W vs 165W.
Core i9-10940X
2019Xeon Gold 6154
2017Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +11.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 165W instead of 200W, a 35W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅+28.6% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 19 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 18 cores / 36 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (19 MB vs 25 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 6154, which brings 18 cores / 36 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $784 MSRP, while Xeon Gold 6154 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-10940X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (27,457 vs 27,684).
- ❌21.2% higher power demand at 200W vs 165W.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i9-10940X better than Xeon Gold 6154?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i9-10940X | Xeon Gold 6154 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 279 FPS | 181 FPS |
| medium | 249 FPS | 145 FPS |
| high | 206 FPS | 119 FPS |
| ultra | 174 FPS | 92 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 233 FPS | 147 FPS |
| medium | 189 FPS | 115 FPS |
| high | 154 FPS | 93 FPS |
| ultra | 134 FPS | 72 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 164 FPS | 68 FPS |
| medium | 134 FPS | 57 FPS |
| high | 105 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 36 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i9-10940X | Xeon Gold 6154 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 550 FPS | 398 FPS |
| medium | 457 FPS | 345 FPS |
| high | 379 FPS | 290 FPS |
| ultra | 342 FPS | 242 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 456 FPS | 345 FPS |
| medium | 394 FPS | 306 FPS |
| high | 332 FPS | 258 FPS |
| ultra | 287 FPS | 214 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 283 FPS | 223 FPS |
| medium | 246 FPS | 198 FPS |
| high | 226 FPS | 178 FPS |
| ultra | 197 FPS | 146 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i9-10940X | Xeon Gold 6154 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 692 FPS | 686 FPS |
| medium | 692 FPS | 686 FPS |
| high | 692 FPS | 686 FPS |
| ultra | 692 FPS | 686 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 692 FPS | 686 FPS |
| medium | 692 FPS | 624 FPS |
| high | 692 FPS | 594 FPS |
| ultra | 656 FPS | 529 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 595 FPS | 465 FPS |
| medium | 500 FPS | 363 FPS |
| high | 444 FPS | 325 FPS |
| ultra | 373 FPS | 265 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i9-10940X | Xeon Gold 6154 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 692 FPS | 686 FPS |
| medium | 692 FPS | 686 FPS |
| high | 692 FPS | 678 FPS |
| ultra | 692 FPS | 590 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 692 FPS | 686 FPS |
| medium | 692 FPS | 609 FPS |
| high | 639 FPS | 526 FPS |
| ultra | 560 FPS | 452 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 580 FPS | 481 FPS |
| medium | 516 FPS | 429 FPS |
| high | 464 FPS | 384 FPS |
| ultra | 408 FPS | 334 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i9-10940X and Xeon Gold 6154

Core i9-10940X
Core i9-10940X
The Core i9-10940X is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake-X (2019) architecture. It features 14 cores and 28 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 19.25 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2066. Thermal design power (TDP): 165 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 27,684 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon Gold 6154
Xeon Gold 6154
The Xeon Gold 6154 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 July 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 18 cores and 36 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 24.75 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 200 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 27,457 points. Launch price was $3,543.
Processing Power
The Core i9-10940X packs 14 cores / 28 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6154 offers 18 cores / 36 threads — the Xeon Gold 6154 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Core i9-10940X versus 3.7 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6154 — a 25.9% clock advantage for the Core i9-10940X (base: 3.3 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Core i9-10940X uses the Cascade Lake-X (2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6154 uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-10940X scores 27,684 against the Xeon Gold 6154's 27,457 — a 0.8% lead for the Core i9-10940X. L3 cache: 19.25 MB (total) on the Core i9-10940X vs 24.75 MB (total) on the Xeon Gold 6154.
| Feature | Core i9-10940X | Xeon Gold 6154 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 14 / 28 | 18 / 36+29% |
| Boost Clock | 4.8 GHz+30% | 3.7 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.3 GHz+10% | 3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 19.25 MB (total) | 24.75 MB (total)+29% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Cascade Lake-X (2019) | Skylake (server) (2017−2018) |
| PassMark | 27,684 | 27,457 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 19,000 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,450 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 11,000 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i9-10940X uses the LGA2066 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon Gold 6154 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i9-10940X | Xeon Gold 6154 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA2066 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2933 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 256 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 4 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 48 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i9-10940X) / not specified (Xeon Gold 6154). Primary use case: Core i9-10940X targets High-End Desktop.
| Feature | Core i9-10940X | Xeon Gold 6154 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| IGPU Model | None | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | Yes | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
| Target Use | High-End Desktop | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













