PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i9-10940X vs Xeon W-2195 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i9-10940X vs Xeon W-2195: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i9-10940X

2019

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +6.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (19,000 vs 21,000).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (19 MB vs 25 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W-2195, which brings 18 cores / 36 threads.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 35.3 vs 186.5 PassMark/$ ($784 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
❌17.9% higher power demand at 165W vs 140W.

Xeon W-2195

2017

Why buy it

✅+10.5% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
✅+28.6% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 19 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 18 cores / 36 threads.
✅Costs $634 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $784 MSRP).
✅Delivers 428.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 186.5 vs 35.3 PassMark/$ ($150 MSRP vs $784 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-10940X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon W-2195 better than Core i9-10940X?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon W-2195 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i9-10940X is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon W-2195 is the stronger fit. You are getting 10.5% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 18 cores and 36 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 28.6% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 19 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon W-2195 is the better buy right now. Xeon W-2195 comes in $634 cheaper on MSRP at $150 MSRP versus $784 MSRP, and it still gives you 10.5% better Cinebench R23 multi-core. The compromise is that Core i9-10940X is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 6.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 428.2% better value on MSRP (186.5 vs 35.3 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i9-10940X makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2017). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i9-10940X vs Xeon W-2195 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i9-10940X

The Core i9-10940X is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake-X (2019) architecture. It features 14 cores and 28 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 19.25 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2066. Thermal design power (TDP): 165 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 27,684 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon W-2195

The Xeon W-2195 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 29 September 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 18 cores and 36 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 24.75 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 140 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400, DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 27,977 points. Launch price was $2,553.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i9-10940X packs 14 cores / 28 threads, while the Xeon W-2195 offers 18 cores / 36 threads — the Xeon W-2195 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Core i9-10940X versus 4.3 GHz on the Xeon W-2195 — a 11% clock advantage for the Core i9-10940X (base: 3.3 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The Core i9-10940X uses the Cascade Lake-X (2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon W-2195 uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-10940X scores 27,684 against the Xeon W-2195's 27,977 — a 1.1% lead for the Xeon W-2195. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 19,000 vs 21,000 (10% advantage for the Xeon W-2195). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,450 vs 1,300, a 10.9% lead for the Core i9-10940X that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 11,000 vs 10,002 (9.5% advantage for the Core i9-10940X). L3 cache: 19.25 MB (total) on the Core i9-10940X vs 24.75 MB (total) on the Xeon W-2195.

Feature	Core i9-10940X	Xeon W-2195
Cores / Threads	14 / 28	18 / 36+29%
Boost Clock	4.8 GHz+12%	4.3 GHz
Base Clock	3.3 GHz+43%	2.3 GHz
L3 Cache	19.25 MB (total)	24.75 MB (total)+29%
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	1 MB (per core)
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Cascade Lake-X (2019)	Skylake (server) (2017−2018)
PassMark	27,684	27,977+1%
Cinebench R23 Multi	19,000	21,000+11%
Geekbench 6 Single	1,450+12%	1,300
Geekbench 6 Multi	11,000+10%	10,002

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i9-10940X uses the LGA2066 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon W-2195 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2933 on the Core i9-10940X versus DDR4-2666 on the Xeon W-2195 — the Core i9-10940X supports 10% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon W-2195 supports up to 512 GB of RAM compared to 256 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 4-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 48 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: X299 (Core i9-10940X) and C422 (Xeon W-2195).

Feature	Core i9-10940X	Xeon W-2195
Socket	LGA2066	LGA2011
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2933+10%	DDR4-2666
Max RAM Capacity	256 GB	512 GB+100%
RAM Channels	4	4
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	48	48

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Core i9-10940X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i9-10940X) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon W-2195). Primary use case: Core i9-10940X targets High-End Desktop, Xeon W-2195 targets Scientific Workstation / Data Analysis. Direct competitor: Xeon W-2195 rivals Ryzen Threadripper 1950X.

Feature	Core i9-10940X	Xeon W-2195
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	—
Unlocked	Yes	No
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use	High-End Desktop	Scientific Workstation / Data Analysis

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i9-10940X was priced at $784, while the Xeon W-2195 came in at $150. On launch pricing ($784 vs $150), Xeon W-2195 was $634 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i9-10940X delivers 35.3 pts/$ vs 186.5 pts/$ for the Xeon W-2195 — making the Xeon W-2195 the 136.3% better value option.

Feature	Core i9-10940X	Xeon W-2195
MSRP	$784	$150-81%
Performance per Dollar	35.3	186.5+428%
Release Date	2019	2017

Search Core i9-10940X on Amazon

Search Xeon W-2195 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.